Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!

Forgery claims and unreadable signatures

Question: Our customer brought in a paid check from his monthly statement that he said is forged. This customer's signature is nothing more than a short scribble and no two signature specimens are nearly the same in appearance. Each specimen signature has wildly varying peaks, valleys, and swirls - some with loops and others without loops. Some specimens start in a left direction and others in a right direction.

We asked the customer to sign a forgery affidavit, which he did after expressing some reluctance because he couldn't be absolutely sure it was not his signature due to his unusual style. He finally decided to sign the affidavit, reasoning that he did not remember writing the check to the unknown payee. Also, he could not locate the duplicate (carbon) copy of the check and he claims the check and the carbon had both been removed from the pad of checks. Is there any basis for rejecting this forgery claim?

Answer: I'd say there was considerable basis! First you'd want to ask him many questions about where he kept his check book, who had access to it, and also investigate the payee's location/business/relationship, etc. And certainly the signature itself may be a form of negligence.

Secondly, you need to get another signed document from him - one that says you will no longer be liable for any forged signature claim on his signature. Some banks put into their terms and agreement that the financial institution is not liable if it fails to detect a forgery when the forgery is such that a reasonable person is not able to detect it. If you decide to keep his account, you might want to include that clause in your agreement.

I am reminded of a would-be depositor at my bank who came in and wanted to give us five signatures cards because "ůmy style of signature depends on how I feel that day." We refused to open an account for him. He sued. We won. The judge said his request was unreasonable.

Copyright © 2003 Bankers' Hotline. Originally appeared in Bankers' Hotline, Vol. 13, No. 7, 10/03




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.