Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us



Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!

Forged Checks & Signature Verification

Question: We've had a claim on six forged checks from one of our customers who has a construction business. In our conversation with him while filling out the forgery affidavits, he told us he pretty much knew who did it, because he knows the name of the payee on the checks. He said, "The SOB must have spotted the checkbook I keep on the front seat of my pick-up all the time and stole the checks out of the back of the checkbook."

At this point, we felt secure in telling him he didn't have a claim, because of customer negligence, referred to in our customer agreement and as described in the UCC. We'd read about that in articles in the BANKERS' HOTLINE.

He has now come back to us and says that when he read the section of UCC that we quoted it says that we're negligent too, because we didn't check his signature. I'm sure somewhere there is a defense for this. Can you tell me where?

Answer: Sure can. In our conversation I learned that all his checks came in through the exchange - not over your counter. The revised UCC recognizes that we do bulk filing, and do not examine the checks that come in through the clearing exchange. You'll find you are relieved of that responsibility in Section 3-103 (a) (7) which are the definitions in Section 3…
(7) "Ordinary care" in the case of a person engaged in business means observance of reasonable commercial standards, prevailing in the area in which the person is located, with respect to the business in which the person is engaged. In the case of a bank that takes an instrument for processing for collection or payment by automated means, reasonable commercial standards do not require the bank to examine the instrument if the failure to examine does not violate the bank's prescribed procedures and the bank's procedures do not vary unreasonably from general banking usage not disapproved by this Article or Article 4.

Copyright © 2004 Bankers' Hotline. Originally appeared in Bankers' Hotline, Vol. 14, No. 3, 7/05




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.