Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us


Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!


Nonpayment Disclosure to Payee

Question: Recently a non-customer contacted me with two items drawn on my bank. The two checks were stamped "NSF" and "Do Not Redeposit." This person had in her hand a letter that had been inadvertently sent to our customer from a Customer Service Representative indicating the checks had cleared. We will, of course, notify our customer that this letter was sent in error and that the facts are different.

The non-customer also requested a letter from us stating that these two items were not paid as indicated. The customer and non-customer are involved in a law suit. These two items and other matters are part of the suit. I agreed to prepare a letter simply stating that the items we viewed were not paid. I was planning to include the account number and check numbers in the letter. Compliance advised me not to send the letter, based on customer privacy issues. My question is: how are we violating customer privacy regulations? The letter was not sent and I informed the non-customer that a Court Subpoena would be necessary for the bank to respond.

Answer: Seems as if we're all getting a bit paranoid with the privacy bit, doesn't it? The non-customer is the payee on the check. He has a right to know if the check was not paid, because he is a party to the transaction. You would not be in trouble if all you did was state the facts in a letter addressed to the payee. "Check Number ### in the amount of $$$, dated 0/0/00, payable to the order of XXX drawn on account number ### was never paid, according to bank records." You are not revealing this to a third party - only to one of the parties of the transaction. Our customer privacy regulations have to do with third party revelations. You probably would have been OK writing the letter, as all of the customer's information was already on the check in the non-customer's hand.

Copyright © 2005 Bankers' Hotline. Originally appeared in Bankers' Hotline, Vol. 15, No. 8, 8/05




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.