Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

BOL Toolbar

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us



Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!


Application fees, credit reports, and disclosure

Question: We charge all applicants a $75 application fee. We have a contract with a credit bureau under which we pay an annual fee for all credit reports pulled during the year. The cost usually amounts to about $2.00 per customer. We do not directly pass this on to the customer. Does RESPA require us to disclose this, and if so, do we have to take it out of the application fee?

Answer: HUD interprets RESPA to require you to disclose the cost of the credit report on each customer's HUD-1 or HUD-1A even if you don't directly charge the customer for the cost. The theory is that you really are passing on the cost somehow so the consumer should be made aware that the service was performed and at what cost. Personally, we prefer the TIL approach: if costs are being rolled up into something, they will be revealed in the APR. This makes much more sense - and takes much less work. Strictly speaking, to comply with HUD's interpretations, you should be showing a $2.00 cost as a p.o.c. You might also want to label this as an estimate, since the actual cost could turn out to be $2.03. (Can you tell our tongue is in our cheek?) As a practical matter, I can't see anyone - even someone who has spent too long at HUD - making a case based on a $2.00 fee.

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 8, No. 14, 1/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.