Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



The Preemption Debate Gets Hotter

In the wake of issuing a rule that clarifies and explains the federal preemption of state banking laws, including consumer protection, the OCC finds itself under fire from a wide variety of sources. All that the preemption rule actually does is clarify existing law. The regulation issued by the OCC explains how and when federal preemption will apply to state laws. In short, it adds clarity to the question of preemption and saves all parties a great deal of trouble - such as going to court to get answers.

The rule is under attack as though it had suddenly been made up from whole cloth. The attacks are uninformed but energetic. USA Today, for example, ran an editorial criticizing the OCC for using federal powers to preempt what it said were stronger state laws. The newspaper also claimed, in the same editorial, that states are better equipped to enforce their laws whereas federal regulators have limited staffs and other agendas.

The USA Today editorial, like many others, was based on opinion more than information. But it will be more widely read than the OCC's careful explanations of its rule. It contained no information about the fact that most of the predatory lenders are under state supervision exclusively. It also made no reference to the fact that some state consumer protection laws, such as Georgia's, were actually having the result of making credit unavailable on any terms, predatory or fair.

What becomes clear in the objections to the OCC rule is that the real debate is not actually about consumer protection; it is about power and who is in charge. The states and consumer groups both lose power when the OCC preempts the field.

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 9, No. 2, 3/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.