Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Compliance Signposts

The popular term for compliance is regulatory burden. Granted, compliance is burdensome. It is stuff that just doesn't happen naturally. But the law makes us do it and do it a certain way - and often that way isn't the way we would choose. That's why we like to call it a legislatively mandated unnatural act.

Looked at it in this context, compliance is a burden. It requires training, tools, procedures, policies, and constant attention. The attention comes in the form of compliance management, audits, monitoring, controls, and revisions to policies and procedures. In short, it is a lot of work.

What did the banking industry do to deserve this?

What the industry did was a lot or nothing, depending on how you look at it. Some products and services actually cost consumers more than they felt was fair. In other situations, the institutions practiced a form of benign neglect, failing to notice when it could make products and services more suitable for its customers.

Consumers got attention the usual way - by going to Congress. The result is legislation in the form of many consumer protection laws. The goals of the laws are laudable. But any industry member can tell you that the devil is in the details. It is the details (such as calculating payment streams correctly for TIL disclosures) that result in violations.

We are now in a period of heightened attention to practices that may or do harm consumers. Predatory lending is high on the list of concerns. Regulators are using and referring to Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices (UDAP) more than ever before. This could all lead to more regulatory burden and that additional burden - well, you know about the last straw and the camel's back.

How do we prevent more burden? Preventing additional burden is something over which the industry actually has a great deal of control. Even though the laws are generated by others, it is the industry's practices that place fuel on the fire.

The existing regulatory burden provides us with signposts to the path of regulatory burden prevention. When we look behind each consumer protection law, we can see what led to the practice.

For example, when banks placed 30-day holds on check deposits to new accounts, their new customers were understandably frustrated. It didn't help that these holds happened to Congressional staffers or to the daughter of a Governor of the Federal Reserve System. Customers wanted access to their money within a reasonable time and we now have Regulation CC - and all that work designing and implementing holds, to say nothing of the training involved!

And can you imagine a time when the lender told the customer to just sign on the dotted line and don't ask any questions? Enter Truth in Lending.

And what about using access to the credit bureau reports to find out how your neighbor paid for that satellite TV set-up or the new car? FCRA put a stop to that - at least it was supposed to.

It wasn't long ago that financial institutions forgot about their fiduciary role with respect to customers and considered the personal and transaction information about their customers to be a commodity that they could sell. In their excitement about the addition to the bottom line, these institutions overlooked how their customers would see this - as a serious violation of trust.

In short, it is easy to generate regulatory burden. Just get greedy and don't look at the consequences. Take a look at what you and other members of the industry are doing and how consumers react. You should see some things that belong on your radar screen. You should see some things that lead to best instead of bad or worst business practices. Follow the best practices and help prevent more regulatory burden.

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 9, No. 3, 4/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.