Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Conflicting Rules

Question: When one office of a regulator says one thing and another office in the same regulator says something that conflicts, what do we do? The example in hand is keeping copies of identification documents such as a driver's license in the loan file. The CIP rules say this is ok and Regulation B prohibits it. Which rule prevails?

Answer: Conflicts in rules occur more often than we'd like and the conflicts can make compliance very difficult. In the particular example you cite, there are some important differences between the rules. On the one hand, you have the drafters of the CIP rule thinking of ways to identify customers. In that context, looking at picture IDs seems to be a good idea. Making a copy to prove you looked at it also seems like a good idea. So the designers of the CIP rule said "sounds ok to us."

Enter Regulation B and concerns about discrimination. One of the primary controls for preventing discrimination is to prohibit the creditor from learning about and having access to information that could be used to discriminate. This includes information about race, ethnicity, and gender. Regulation B prohibits creditors from collecting this information in most credit applications so that it cannot be used to treat the applicant unfairly. Only for loans that require heavy documentation - mortgage loans - is the information required so that examiners can monitor the loan decisions.

On the one hand, there is the CIP rule which says that collecting a copy is reasonable. On the other, is Regulation B which says that in the lending context other than mortgages, collecting the information is illegal. Regulation B's clear prohibition prevails over the CIP "seems reasonable" standard. The answer is don't collect copies of picture IDs and place them in loan files. Use another method to verify the CIP procedure.

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 9, No. 8, 8/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.