Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



How?

How?
Compliance has undergone an enormous change. Or, if you prefer, a significant evolution. It is the change from "what" to "how."

In the days of yore - compliance-wise - the art of compliance was the ability or necessity to read Regulation Z and similar tomes. What happened after the reading was not the focus of attention. For CEOs, the compliance challenge was met when someone was assigned the fun task of reading the regulations. The knowledge then existed within the bank and all was well.

The compliance manager was the manager of knowledge and information. This lucky individual had the responsibility of distributing this knowledge around the institution, hopefully to the right places. Think of this as a knowledge-share plan. In fact, compliance officers were often used as regulatory mail rooms because the compliance officer was the most likely person to know where various forms of regulatory mail and information should be sent. In a way, the compliance manager was the ombudsman of the incoming.

Over time, compliance regulations have become more complicated and the job of complying with diverse and detailed regulations has become significantly more difficult. Things are no longer hand-held and questions about what to do next are not easy to answer.

Compliance has changed from "what" to "how?" The job of compliance management is the job of getting compliance done - wherever and however. In fact, the biggest challenge for compliance managers today is figuring out how to get compliance to work in their institutions. There is a great deal of material that explains what the rules are - and much of that information is right on the money. But knowing what the finance charge definition says and applying it to the many activities and fees that occur in the institution is more easily said than done. Capturing data items correctly for the HMDA LAR is not easy either.

Implementing the multitudinous features of the FACT Act is a daunting project because it involves every activity in the institution. One implementation team or project won't do the trick. And this, at the core, is the real challenge of compliance. The question is not simply what has to be done but how to do it. Too often - in fact almost always - no-one deals with "how" until the project lands on the compliance manager's desk.

Compliance laws and regulations have laudable goals. But until the details are worked out, that's all they are - goals. The compliance job is to transform these goals into reality. This is not usually easy. In fact, for most compliance - including the FACT Act - the goals have been dealt with without dealing with the realities.

Whose fault is that?
In large part, it is the fault of the institutions affected by the new rules. Why? Because they sat back silently, said nothing, and waited until the rule was final to begin work. For example, who commented on the FTC's proposed rules on identity theft and active duty alerts? There were a total of 49 public comments. Most came from trade associations and consumer advocacy groups. Did anyone provide the FTC with information about how this proposed process would actually work?

The time to think about how a rule will actually work is before the rule is final. The time to have thought through details about the FACT Act was when it was in Congress, or later when it was enacted. If financial institutions and others affected by the FACT Act had given serious thought to the implementation of the laudable goals when the concepts and rules were being drafted, the implementation might be less difficult. In fact, the act's goals might be more reachable.

But an industry that sits back and let those who do not do the job write all the rules, the industry is left dealing with the consequences. You can make your job easier if you participate in the process. Next time, get involved earlier!

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 9, No. 13, 11/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.