Click to return to BOL home page
 


MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    Article 9

    FACTA/FCRA

    HMDA Heaven

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    HR Corner

    IRA Season

    Money Matters

    Operations Tools

    SARResearchGuide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Disaster Updates

    Disaster Recovery

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Disaster Issuances

Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Lessons Learned

Monthly Roundup

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
Background Check
BOL Conferencing

CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Books
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

Banker Humor

Banker Memories

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Lessons in Enforcement Actions: BSA

Enforcement actions serve several purposes. One is to correct the violations. Another is to provide guidance for other institutions subject to the same regulations. Enforcement cases thus provide a good measurement tool for your compliance programs. Except for remedial requirements, such as civil money penalties or back filing, most elements of a consent order simply require what should have been in place to prevent the violations.

For example, look at the FRB's enforcement order against Standard Chartered Bank. The action involved anti-money laundering problems. Both the Federal Reserve and the State of New York had concerns that Standard Chartered, as an international bank, was not maintaining a strong BSA program. One of the corrective measures, in addition to development of improved controls and recordkeeping, requires the bank to develop controls to ensure compliance with all requirements relating to correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons and shell banks.

A second significant requirement is that the bank develop a methodology for assigning risk levels to the customer base, including correspondent account holders. Risks, controls, training and documentation sums up the required elements in this case.

The FRB of San Francisco's written agreement with County Bank, Merced, CA reveals a similar emphasis on controls to ensure compliance. County Bank must develop written procedures and improve internal controls for BSA compliance. The bank must also conduct a risk focused assessment of the customer base that is designed to distinguish between transactions that are usual and those that indicate risk.

Copyright © 2004 Compliance Action. Originally appeared in Compliance Action, Vol. 9, No. 14, 12/04




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.