Sunday, November 23, 2008
      ( 1:56 PM ) Andy  
Bank catches real problem in survey

This is one of those unbelievable stories that make you glad there are procedures to follow. In Killeen, Texas, a family wanted their dream home. They found a 5 acre lot with a For Sale sign and they bought it. They cleared the lot, and on it they constructed a 5,300 sqft home with six bedrooms, five baths, a two car garage and a rooftop deck.

Now the real kicker, the builder went to a bank for a loan. The bank wanted a survey. Turns out the Realtor put the For Sale sign in the lot next the one that was purchased. The house was built on the WRONG LOT. I don't know how this could have happened, but it did as the builder and buyer based everything on where the sign was, but the legals were for the next property over.

The family sold their existing home which is already rented out. They may live in a hotel for awhile. They have to see if the other property owner will trade 5 acre tracts or sell them their property. If you are the other property owner, I suppose you have a great improvement, and your property taxes will reflect this whether you like it or not.

Always, always, always get that survey.
#




Tuesday, November 11, 2008
      ( 12:56 PM ) Andy  
Is Reg B Compliance Really Necessary if Fair Lending Isn't a Problem?

You bet it is. But you knew that. In case you need any support for your case, read more below.

According to JSOnline, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the FDIC questioned compliance with Reg B at an Elkhorn bank. The directors there "failed to provide adequate supervision over, and direction to, the active management of the bank in the area of consumer compliance." One issue was the clarity of why applicants were refused loans. The bank had to complete a file search of adverse actions from August 20, 2007 until February 20, 2008. While only for a six month period, this could still be an expensive task. Those notices that were not compliant had to be produced properly and re-delivered.

It was noted that the bank was sound financially, but lacking in compliance. The issues were being rectified.
#




Go to:


archives:
04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009

Return to Main Blog

Powered by Blogger.com