Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store Read A Reg Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network

   

















    Site Map

    Our Sponsors

    Home













Compliance Gurus
Lending Gurus
Security Gurus
Marketing Gurus
Technology Gurus
eBanking Gurus

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!


Lost Debit Card Liability
by: Andy Zavoina, BOL Guru
BIO AND CONTACT INFO

Question: We have a customer who says that on Nov. 7, 2000, he called our bank to report his debit card lost. There had been $2750.00 charges on his card in one month. He said our bookkeeper at this time told him the whole loss was his. We have no record of his call. He stated in a letter to me April 5, 2002 that he knew he lost his card October 5, 2000 but just did not report it. Now he wants all but $500.00 back. Are we liable, since he knew a month earlier and did not report it, we could have stopped most of the charges? Also, after two years where do we stand with time limits? Also, some of these transactions were PIN-based.

Answer: For non-Reg. E liabilities, you will have to look at the debit card rules for those non-PIN based transactions and verify when those rules took effect as compared to the transactions.

Divide the claim amounts into debit card and Reg. E. Now you'll know your limits. If most of the loss is say, in debit cards, and you decide those have to be paid, the Reg. E limits may be moot.

As to the Reg. E limits, had he actually reported it when he said he did, there would be a $500 max liability.

You will have to evaluate your relationship with the customer, its value and your standard procedures.

How much do you want to keep the customer? Refusing the claim may lose the depositor and prompt a complaint to your regulator.

Do you believe that his call could have gone unrecorded? If that is highly unlikely because you have always handled claims in the XYZ manner and there have been no other complaints, you may want to stand by your contention that the claim was not made, and that making it now places the liability on him, at least for the Reg. E amounts.

I would also document why he says he is making this claim now. Quite a lot of time has passed and this reduces the validity of his claim.

First published on BankersOnline.com 5/06/02







Home | Compliance | Lending | Operations | Security | Marketing | Technology | eBanking
BOL Archives    Privacy Policy    Important Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.