There has been some confusion regarding the difference and interaction between the Federal ESIGN Act (Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act) and UETA (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act) as adopted by many states. Mr. Whitaker notes some of the consistencies and conflicts in addition to commenting on the Federal preemption issue.
The Federal ESIGN Act
Like the UETA…
Adopts UETA definitions of
Electronic
Electronic Agent (non-material language variation)
Electronic Record
Electronic Signature (non-material language variation)
Information
Person
Record
Transaction (with additional language)
Adopts (in restated form) the three pillars of the UETA
Adopts "Opt-in" rule
Adopts preservation of formatting requirements
Adopts record & check retention rules (with added specificity)
Adopts the rule permitting electronic originals
Adopts the special retention and accessibility rules for records required for later reference (in modified form)
Adopts the rules on notarization
Adopts the rules for electronic agents (in modified form)
Adopts the exceptions for
Wills, codicils and testamentary trusts
Articles 3 through 9 of the UCC
Grants regulators authority to determine when and if government documents will be filed electronically, and to specify formats and other requirements
Grants regulators authority to establish record retention requirements for records required to be available for government inspection, review or audit
Makes explicit (implicit in UETA)…
Preservation of substantive legal rights and obligations
Preservation of content and timing of consumer disclosures
Preservation of any rule concerning the proximity or physical location of any warning, notice or disclosure
Application to insurance laws
Authority of regulators to establish interpretive rules within substantive jurisdiction
The Federal ESIGN Act
Unlike the UETA…
Excludes recordings of oral communications from definition of electronic record for purposes of consumer notices and disclosures
Adds additional exclusions and exemptions from the statute
Legal rules governing adoption, divorce, and other matters of family law
Court documents requiring execution in connection with court proceedings
Notice of utility termination, default or foreclosure under mortgage or lease, termination of health or life insurance, and product recalls and safety notices
Notices that accompany transportation or handling of hazardous materials, pesticides, and other toxic materials
Expressly limits regulatory authority to impede or obstruct effective use of the statute
Limits Transferable Records to promissory notes secured by an interest in real property
No variation by agreement
Omits default rules for
Establishing when electronic record is sent or received
Liability for transmission errors
Evidence rule
Federal Preemption - a closer look
Statute's application is "limited" to commercial (including consumer) and business transactions in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce
Limitation is based on breadth of Interstate Commerce Clause in Constitution
Any interstate nexus should be sufficient
Use of interstate communications (telephone, internet, cellular phone systems)
Involvement of federally insured or regulated institution
Use of products created, sold, leased or licensed by out-of-state vendors
State may supercede requirements of ESIGN with
Adoption of the Official Text of the UETA (before or after ESIGN enactment)
Adoption of another statute, or any regulation (under UETA, ESIGN or otherwise), that is
Consistent with ESIGN Act Titles I and II
Does not favor a specific technology (except for rules governing procurement)
If enacted after ESIGN, make specific reference to ESIGN Act
Four potential interpretations of exception for states enacting UETA
Official Text or nothing - any non-uniform amendments invalidate entire statute
Official Text survives - any non-uniform amendment is invalid
Official Text survives if consistent - Entire statute must be evaluated for consistency with ESIGN
Official text plus consistent provisions - Provisions from UETA Official Text survive, plus non-uniform amendments okay if consistent with ESIGN
State can establish rules governing filing of records without regard to ESIGN
ESIGN Consumer consent requirements and retention and access rules only apply to transactions if underlying statute or rule of law requires a writing
Example of State Law -- The Kentucky UETA
Excludes from the UETA any "law governing the conveyance of any interest in real property"
Defaults to ESIGN
Nothing in ESIGN prevents state from adopting statute with consistent rules, but narrower scope than ESIGN
But…that means that ESIGN covers all transactions in interstate commerce excluded from state law
Excludes any "law governing the creation or transfer of any negotiable instrument or any instrument establishing title or an interest in title."
Doesn't impact transferable record provisions in UETA
Mr. Whitaker is of counsel in the Washington D.C. office of GoodwinProcter LLP and is a member of its Financial Services Practice. He specializes in electronic commerce issues and financial services law and has extensiveexperience with practical application of laws governing electronic banking, letters of credit, payment systems and commercial and consumer financing.
BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our
advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all
banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking
through to learn more about their products and services.