Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Learn More - Click Here!

Thread Options
#103978 - 08/06/03 08:13 PM POS vs POP--Return
Anonymous
Unregistered

If I understand the definitions correctly, Point-of-Sale transactions and Point-of-Purchase transactions are not the same. So, if a POS transaction has been identified as a duplicate by a customer, is it returned as a R10 or am I completely confusing the return process for disputed POS items?

Return to Top
Operations Compliance
#103979 - 08/07/03 02:38 PM Re: POS vs POP--Return
RandomName Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,373
Austin, TX
Although the POS and POP items come from different origins (POP has a physical check as its source), you can use the R10 return reason code for both, as long as the debit in question falls within the 60-day timeframe. See page OG 74 of the 2003 NACHA rules book.

Return to Top
#103980 - 08/07/03 03:10 PM Re: POS vs POP--Return
Rubaiyat Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,373
Lido Deck
You may also be able to use R24 "Duplicate Entry". You just need to be sure that the Originator has not already discovered the error and done a reversal before you do your return.
_________________________
--A bad day at sea is better than a good day at work.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z, John Burnett