Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Learn More - Click Here!

Thread Options
#106379 - 08/14/03 06:48 PM Reg E-Immediate Resolution
Anonymous
Unregistered

We are in debate about whether or not Reg E paperwork should be completed if a customer comes in and says that he/she did not receive the money requested at the ATM. On the Retail side, they would like to give the money back to the customer immediately (if shown posted on the customer's account) without completing Reg E paperwork-case closed. On the Compliance side, the consensus is that Reg E paperwork should be completed regardless since this was an issue that a customer brought to the bank's attention. Compliance feels that it's fine to give immediate (provisional) credit but the paperwork should be completed. Retail disputes and says no other research will be done so why should they go through the hastle of paperwork. Any thoughts?

Return to Top
Operations Compliance
#106380 - 08/14/03 07:04 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Quote:

Retail disputes and says no other research will be done so why should they go through the hastle of paperwork. Any thoughts?



I understand Retail's position, but I'm not sympathetic. Your bank needs to document its error-resolution cases for two reasons: (1) to ensure that you don't duplicate your work (and credit) for a repeated error allegation; and (2) to keep the examiners and auditors happy.

Your documentation certainly doesn't need to be as complete as you would have for a case that takes several days to research. You could boil down the essential information to a few items. But I suggest you record these events.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#106381 - 08/14/03 07:15 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
Anonymous
Unregistered

Thanks! I completely agree but wanted another opinion. Now that another party agrees with me, maybe they'll "get it".

Return to Top
#106382 - 08/14/03 08:08 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Caveat, Anon. My opinions often do not carry as much weight as I do.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#106383 - 08/14/03 08:17 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,754
On the Net
Reg. E's OSC at 11(c)4 provides that with automatic payment the time-lines don't matter, but other requirements in .11 will, which include written explanations and those pain in the asset things.
_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
#106384 - 08/14/03 08:17 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
Anonymous
Unregistered

MY Opinion:

You can give the customer immediate credit but you still need to prepare the paperwork. The customer still needs to receive the notification letter telling them that the error was resolved in their favor. Also, I would log the error.

Return to Top
#106385 - 08/15/03 01:17 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
tuma Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 368
Here & There
Speaking of the pain things; .11 allows the bank to require a written statement from the acct holder. If the acct holder fails to give one, will that give the bank an out on providing a "written" notice of resolution?

Also, there is a fine line between an acct inquiry and notice that an error has occured, especially if made in person:
1) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, any idea why?"
2) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, why?"
3) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, my employer informs me that it was send 3 days ago; why?"

Inquiries and complaints made in person can get into that gray area.

Return to Top
#106386 - 08/15/03 01:35 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Quote:

Also, there is a fine line between an acct inquiry and notice that an error has occured, especially if made in person:
1) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, any idea why?"
2) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, why?"
3) "My direct deposit isn't posted yet, my employer informs me that it was send 3 days ago; why?"

Inquiries and complaints made in person can get into that gray area.





A great illustration of why it's important that front line people be trained in error resolution procedures (certainly about how to recognize the need), even if they're not involved in the research and follow-up.

Comment on the suggestion above that even these "instant service" adjustments need to be recorded: Remember that your examiner will almost certainly take an "if it isn't documented, it didn't happen" approach.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#106387 - 08/15/03 02:41 PM Re: Reg E-Immediate Resolution
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,754
On the Net
Quote:

Speaking of the pain things; .11 allows the bank to require a written statement from the acct holder. If the acct holder fails to give one, will that give the bank an out on providing a "written" notice of resolution?




It only effects provisional credit. The rest is still on you.

We never did it, but excessive claims is one reason I believe adding a fee for claims would not be a bad thing. They can't be excessive and they shouldn't be imposed on valid claims. But it does help defray the costs of denied claims, if these are a problem to you. My biggest worry would be in the waivers as I believe more would be waived than not. That is a reason I never pushed adding this to the list of fees.
_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z, John Burnett