Click to return to BOL home page


November 19
How to Conduct an Interrogation
Dana Turner

November 19
Blocking Internet Gambling -- Are You Ready?
John Burnett

November 20
Understanding Letters of Credit
Adam LaBoda

December 2
Auditing for the "Orphan" Compliance Regulations
Patricia Cashman

December 8
Robbery Suppression & Apprehension -- The SAFECATCH Strategy
Dana Turner

December 10
RESPA - Completing the New Good Faith Estimate
Mary Beth Guard and
Jack Holzknecht

December 16
RDC Risk Management and FFIEC Compliance: It is harder than you think!
Paul Carrubba and
Dan Fisher

December 18
RESPA - Completing the New HUD-1/1A
Mary Beth Guard and
Jack Holzknecht



Topic Options
#1264048 - 10/08/09 04:00 PM FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions
Compliance4521 Offline
Gold Star

Registered: 01/24/07
Posts: 324
Loc: Washington
This questions is in conjunction with the Federal Reserve press release issued this morning regarding the final steps in consolidating check processing regions. The Press Release indicates that effective first quarter 2010 there will be only check processing region. It also indicates that there will no longer be any checks that would be considred nonlocal for reg. CC purposes.

If a bank is a same day availability institution that places case-by-case and exception holds are there change in terms requirements to notify customers?


Lori

Top
#1264247 - 10/08/09 09:02 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: Compliance4521]
rlcarey Offline
Compliance is my life

Registered: 07/16/01
Posts: 23861
Loc: Galveston, TX
No - you don't tell them (if you use the model disclosures) anything about local and non-local checks, so there is nothing to redisclose.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are my own, take them or leave them.

Top
#1264556 - 10/09/09 11:45 AM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: rlcarey]
John Burnett Online

Compliance is my life

Registered: 10/27/00
Posts: 18557
Loc: Cape Cod
If you're in any of the affected processing regions, though, you will have to get current R/T number listings to your staff members who place holds so they know that "local" is so much more than it was.
_________________________
"I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said." -- Alan Greenspan

Top
#1281133 - 11/04/09 05:33 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: John Burnett]
pguttormsson Offline
New Poster

Registered: 12/09/04
Posts: 2
An article from Compliance Headquarters says:

The article points out the following:
The move to a single paper check-processing region means there will no longer be nonlocal checks. This will affect more than just those institutions with delayed funds availability policies (who are obviously affected because they can no longer use the 2-day/5-day availability provided by the local/nonlocal check distinction). It will also have an affect on most institutions with immediate, same-day, or next-day availability policies. That’s because most institutions with immediate, same-day, or next-day policies also provide for the ability to hold checks on either a case-by-case basis or by using a safeguard exception (sometimes referred to as "special exception"). Institutions that reserve the right to use a case-by-case or safeguard exception hold are required to include that information, including the maximum hold period, in their initial funds availability disclosure. Currently, those hold periods are disclosed based on the time period for nonlocal checks. With nonlocal checks going away, those institutions will need to update their disclosures and send change notices to affected consumers explaining the new rules.

It's online here: The Demise of Nonlocal Checks

Top
#1282081 - 11/05/09 04:42 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: pguttormsson]
Deena Offline
Diamond Poster

Registered: 11/02/00
Posts: 1684
Loc: PA
I don't quite understand this article. We give next-day availability and disclose that we may delay availability on a case-by-case basis based on the exceptions. We disclose that those deposits will generally be available within seven business days. We make no mention of local or non-local checks. I didn't think we would need to change our policy or our disclosure, but this article seems to say we will.
_________________________
Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer.

Top
#1282882 - 11/06/09 03:01 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: Deena]
John Burnett Online

Compliance is my life

Registered: 10/27/00
Posts: 18557
Loc: Cape Cod
If you use seven days in that disclosure, you are fine, IMO. You'll still be able to go to seven days after all checks are considered local. If your disclosure had said eleven days (which would be accurate today, but not after you have no more non-local checks), you'd have to consider change in terms notices.
_________________________
"I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said." -- Alan Greenspan

Top
#1283062 - 11/06/09 05:17 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: John Burnett]
Deena Offline
Diamond Poster

Registered: 11/02/00
Posts: 1684
Loc: PA
Thanks, John. The article didn't give specific examples but made it sound like the changes would require everyone to redisclose and send change in terms notices. I guess it had the intended effect; I read it and questioned our policy and disclosures.
_________________________
Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer.

Top
#1283092 - 11/06/09 05:42 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: Deena]
Reads Regs Offline
Platinum Poster

Registered: 11/15/04
Posts: 861
The FRB just issued a press release about the consolidation of the third (FRB of Philadelphia) and fourth districts (FRB of Cleveland). http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20091106a.htm

The changes are effective 12/12/09.
_________________________
Opinions expressed are my own and are not legal advice.
Formerly known as "Reg._Reader".

Top
#1283461 - 11/09/09 12:49 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: Reads Regs]
MalloryD Offline
Member

Registered: 04/07/04
Posts: 86
Loc: CA
Our disclosures read 5 days and 7 days. I don't belive this will change. Correct?
Depending on the type of check that you deposit, funds may not be available until the fifth business day after the day of your deposit. However the first $100 of your deposits will be available on the first business day.
We will notify you if we delay your ability to withdraw funds for any of these reasons, and we will tell you when the funds will be available. They will generally be available no later than the seventh business day after the day of your deposit.
Also, I believe the lobby signs will remain at 5 days?

Top
#1283537 - 11/09/09 01:39 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: MalloryD]
Ken_Pegasus Offline
Power Poster

Registered: 08/30/01
Posts: 9729
Loc: Another trip around the sun
The "5" is a reference to a case by case hold on a nonlocal check. That will be a "2" when nonlocal checks cease to exist.
_________________________
Try? There is "do" and "do not," there is no "try." Yoda

Top
#1283615 - 11/09/09 02:49 PM Re: FRB Changes in Check Processing Regions [Re: Ken_Pegasus]
MalloryD Offline
Member

Registered: 04/07/04
Posts: 86
Loc: CA
Thank you very much!

Top


Moderator:  Andy Z, John Burnett, Ken_Pegasus