http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22...-barometer.html

snip:

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer

*settles in*

*scoots next to kit* Hi.

*wonders why all these posts have astericks around them*

*my poor thread*

Hi sox.

Hi Deek

Whassup?

at the rate we are going, he will be re-elected.

maybe the stock market is a lagging indicator and we should blame the market increases on Bush?

unfortunately, jenny may well be right.

sigh.

i guess we get what we deserve if we do re-elect him.

::waits in line for government cheese::

do you have something to cut it with Peepers?

Hands peepers a gov't knife

No, only the bad stuff can be blamed on Bush. It's important to use nothing more than a calendar to blamestorm and discount any actual factors. It makes it much easier because thinkin' is hard! This is why, as I've mentioned, I still blame Clinton for the Spice Girls, Hanson and the Macarena.

Maybe contemporaneity does not necessarily indicate causality.

I like the sponteneity in here, although it is lacking some gaity

Ron Paul not getting those delegates as per his campaign press releases?

Hurts myself nodding and shaking head at the same time.

Its a done deal, The One has said he has 5 more years to finish his job.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-ive-got-another-five-years-coming-up-to-tackle-immigration/

Obama: ‘I’ve Got Another Five Years Coming Up’ to Tackle Immigration.

"President Barack Obama, sounding confident about his re-election chances, said this week he has “another five years” to tackle immigration reform."

cant be, that was a priority in 09

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/us/politics/09immig.html


Obama to Push Immigration Bill as One Priority

Maybe he's counting years like he counted states!

incorrect. he is getting them. that has nothing to do with Barry, though.

Wait a minute. He's getting delegates, so he's going to be the nominee. And if he's the nominee, surely the point is to beat Obama, correct?

If you believe (a) that Ron Paul is going to get the delegates to be the nominee, (b) that Ron Paul's nomination by the Republican Party is a good thing, and (c) that President Obama will nevertheless be re-elected, then I can only conclude that you want the Republican to lose to President Obama.

Please advise where I've misunderstood your logic.