Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Learn More - Click Here!

Thread Options
#1669680 - 02/24/12 08:01 PM 16% per annum on loans < $3000
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
I need your help interpreting that section of the Georgia laws. Am I wrong in thinking it meant that you can charge 16% simple interest rate on a loan less than $3,000 as long as the APR doesn't exceed 60%.

Yes, I know I have been in banking for many years and this should be old school but my brain just ain't what she used to be!!

Thanks

Return to Top
#1670455 - 02/28/12 02:38 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
I believe you would be correct, ids. The point where you run into illegal rates on typical contracts is 60% APR, but you have an additional restriction on small loans of no more than 16% simple.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1672451 - 03/02/12 04:32 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 RR Joker
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
Thanks Joker.

Return to Top
#1816645 - 05/22/13 08:29 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
O.k. let me revisit this one more time!! If we have a consumer loan that has an APR greater than 60% if it was the loan fee that put it over 60% is that permissible or wouldn't that still be a violation of the rule?

Return to Top
#1816719 - 05/23/13 12:57 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
Violation.

You may be remembering a LONG TIME AGO, where if you keep records justifying your fee, it was not a FC. That was a mis-interpretation by the State and, at some point, they 'changed their mind' and said 'they didn't mean it'. Or, something to that affect and about that crude. shocked
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1816973 - 05/23/13 07:00 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 RR Joker
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
Thanks Joker. I had a loan officer questioning me about that and he asked if I would revisit the question again. Thought I was right!

Return to Top
#1835443 - 07/23/13 02:27 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
I found the Official Opinion 2003-8 where it talks about it not being considered usery if the origination fee is the reason the APR is greater than 60% but can you find or tell me where to find the one they came back and said they changed their minds?

I'm still beating the horse to death!!

Return to Top
#1835459 - 07/23/13 02:49 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
lds1958 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 508
Found the Opinion that basically repealed the previous Opinion. It is 2003-9.

Thanks!

Return to Top
#1835473 - 07/23/13 02:57 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
Don't you just love it! laugh I guess that just confirms the old saying about "opinions". wink

Now, if you find where they repealed/changed/whatever the late charge part on mobile homes...let me know...k? smile
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1835499 - 07/23/13 03:28 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
James M. Moore Offline
100 Club
James M. Moore
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 110
Georgia
Just out of curiosity...anyone else following the Georgia usury law lawsuit against Synovus? They are basically trying to say that overdraft fees are considered interest.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-court-of-appeals/1626854.html
_________________________
James M. Moore, CRCM
My postings are not legal advice and may not be endorsed by my employer.

Return to Top
#1835506 - 07/23/13 03:38 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
They are.

(for years they have been considered 'time value of money'). I have an opinion letter somewhere at home, or I'd give you a reference to it).

You can charge them, but you'd better stop at or before 60%...I haven't seen a system that can successfully handle that calculation on deposit accounts)

Having said that, and not reading the link (yet), what I'm referring to are daily OD fees...so maybe ^^^ is different. If so, I apologize!
Last edited by RR Joker; 07/23/13 03:42 PM.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1835510 - 07/23/13 03:46 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
In scanning it quickly, I'd say the following is what may have actually bit them in the bohonkus:

Synovus also charges an “Overdraft Collection Fee” if a customer's account remains in overdraft for seven days.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1835572 - 07/23/13 05:03 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
waldensouth Offline
Power Poster
waldensouth
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,985
FINALLY ABOVE the gnat line
That is true. You can't really do the daily overdraft fee in GA. The fee cannot be based on the time value of money or it is considered interest. Usury will apply.
_________________________
"Once you learn to read, you will be forever free."

- Frederick Douglass




My Opinion Only.

Return to Top
#1835589 - 07/23/13 05:28 PM Re: 16% per annum on loans < $3000 lds1958
James M. Moore Offline
100 Club
James M. Moore
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 110
Georgia
It's scary stuff!
_________________________
James M. Moore, CRCM
My postings are not legal advice and may not be endorsed by my employer.

Return to Top