Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#341596 - 04/01/05 12:24 AM KYC/EDD/AML HELP
Anonymous
Unregistered

I'm in the Commercial Real Estate Department dealing mostly with construction lending. Many of our deals are set-up under an LLC for that particular project. This one LLC could have many "owners" including individuals, corps, other LLCs. etc. How are other banks gathering KYC/EDD/AML information on all these "owners" and how far down the chain do you go?

Our Compliance Officer says we should use a 10% ownership rule, only gathering info on "owners" of 10% or more of the originating entity, but in the next breath says we should drill down to all the "owners".

Does the size of the deal make a difference?

Do we need AML info on "owners" who are investors in 1% of the originating entity?

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#341597 - 04/01/05 12:56 AM Re: KYC/EDD/AML HELP
Princess Romeo Offline

Power Poster
Princess Romeo
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,272
Where the heart is
Your institution should have decided, based on a risk analysis, what it would consider as "owner" for purposes of CIP. Some banks have set a 10% ownership threshold. Others have set higher, and others have set it lower.

The KYC/EDD/AML information should be on the customer as a whole, the source of funds, the nature of the transaction, and any other considerations for money laundering risk. For real estate deals, you need to be satisfied that you are dealing with legitimate funding from the customer. IOW, you do not want to have a construction loan where the borrower's equity came from laundered money.
_________________________
CRCM,CAMS
Regulations are a poor substitute for ethics.
Just sayin'

Return to Top
#341598 - 04/01/05 01:32 PM Re: KYC/EDD/AML HELP
WildTurkey Offline
Platinum Poster
WildTurkey
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 921
Down South, USA
Quote:

.... Does the size of the deal make a difference? ....



Yes, you may understandably decide that the owner of 4% of a $250,000 deal isn't worth investigating, whereas the owner of 2% of a $5,000,000 deal is a much larger sum, and perhaps worthy of further investigation.
_________________________
This is my opinion; it is not legal advice, nor the view of my employer, and it may change tomorrow.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z