Thread Options
|
#351850 - 04/26/05 08:51 PM
Need CTR guidance
|
New Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1
NC
|
New to industry. Need info relating to aceptablility/legality of informing customers about CTR requirements and structuring guidelines. I've heard that the BSA prohibits from advising customers about the CTR. Is this true???
Are there exceptions?
Last edited by John Burnett; 04/27/05 08:51 PM.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351852 - 04/26/05 09:58 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
Power Poster
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,029
Sweet Home AL
|
It is against the law for someone to "assist" in structuring. This can be tricky. How much information do you need to provide before you cross over from "explaining the rules" to "assisting in structuring". To avoid this pitfall, we train our branch employees to avoid discussing the rules and to provide a brochure explaining CTRs and monetary instrument record keeping rules to the customer. Further questions are referred to a manager to directly to the BSA officer.
Last edited by John Burnett; 04/27/05 08:52 PM.
_________________________
Life without Jesus is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351853 - 04/26/05 11:52 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
As Dig said, "SARs or CTRs?" If it's the latter, search the BSA forum using "Facts You Should Know." It's a vendor produced publication that banks often give customers asking CTR related questions. There have been a number of prior threads.
Discussing SARs with customers is not a good idea.
Last edited by John Burnett; 04/27/05 08:53 PM.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351854 - 04/27/05 06:36 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Sorry all, I meant CTR's. Typo in my title. [Ed. Note: Titles corrected in the string -- JSB]
AML unit @ a large bank, and many of us are confused as to just how much we can tell a customer about the CTR limits to ensure compliance.
We typically explain the law to them, and attempt to get them to comply in the future. Seems to us like shooting ourselves in the foot. Should we even be asking about the customer's source of funds and manner of credits/debits?
How can there be a law, that you can break, but you can't be told about it? That's like getting a ticket for speeding, but no speed limit signs are posted.
Last edited by John Burnett; 04/27/05 08:54 PM.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351856 - 04/27/05 07:28 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
As Dig and Brenda have indicated, we live in a country where people are entitled to know what the law is. You could discuss the legal requirements for CTR filing with a customer ad nauseum without violating the law. The problem is that there are crimes called "structuring" and "assisting in structuring." If your conversation with the customer became detailed and included examples like the one Dig provided or an explanation of how deposits made at 1:45 and 3:15 on the same day would not be aggregated due to your cut off time it would be pretty easy to accuse your employee of "assisting in structuring."
The risk is not hypothetical. In the past, Treasury has "shopped" banks posing as a customer or a potential customer and asked such questions. If you simply hand the customer the booklet and refuse to discuss bank procedures there is no question about what you said or didn't say.
If you search as I suggested earlier, you will find most of this discussion in prior threads.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351857 - 04/28/05 12:17 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Okay, I understand about asking, matter of factly, about the funds at the time of the transaction, IF you happen to be in a position to do so.
But.......What do you think about contacting the customer, after-the-fact, and then questioning the source of funds? Should the banks be responsible for this, or isn't that Law Enforcement's role? Aren't we just supposed to report the activity?
I believe that it may be crossing a dangerous legal line to question private persons, without authority, as to the source of their funds, especially AFTER THE FACT.
Opinions welcome.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#351859 - 04/28/05 03:42 PM
Re: Need CTR guidance
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Dig, nice in theory. Most personal account holders do not have account officer to go to. We R A back-office unit that does follow-up after-the-fact (sometimes more than 90 days later). We actually call the customer and attempt to verify the source of funds (or destination of structured out vs in).
We are not teller unit, and have no personal, face-to-face contact w/ our customers.
Another question: How long, after becoming aware of a reportable event, is the LEGAL requirement to SAR or not SAR?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|