Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us





Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Wording on Adverse Action Notice
by Dan Persfull & Andy Zavoina, BOL Gurus
Guru BIOS

Question: On adverse action notices when co-applicants are involved, is it OK to put the co-applicant's reasons for denial in the "other" section of the applicant's notice and vice versa. Example...1st applicant is turned down for bad credit and length of time on job. Co-applicant has collections and high debt to income. Should the applicant's notice say that he/she was turned down for bad credit and length of time on job and under "other" he/she was turned down for co-applicant's collections issues and high debt to income ratio?

Answer - Dan: We put the following legend on the AAN:

A = Applicant
C = Co-applicant/Co-signer

We then check the appropriate reasons and put A, C, or A&C beside the reasons.

Answer - Andy: If your concern is one of privacy between the applicants, that isn't an issue. Changes to Reg. B were in the Federal Register, 03-18-03, Page 13151. In part it said, "Many commenters were concerned about the co-applicant’s or guarantor’s privacy when the reasons for adverse action pertaining to creditworthiness are given to the primary applicant. When a person agrees to be a co-applicant, guarantor, or similar party, however, there is (or should be) a general understanding that information will be shared. Accordingly, the rule has been adopted as proposed." Emphasis here is that the primary applicant be made aware of ALL the reasons for denial.

First published on BankersOnline.com 9/19/05




Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.