Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store Read A Reg Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

e-Card Exchange

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

HR Corner

Infovault

Launch Pad

Regulator Roadmaps

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

BOL Toolbar

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 


About Our Sponsors
About Us




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!

Specific Wording for "Non-endorsed" Checks
by Mary Beth Guard, BOL Guru

Question: Is there an absolute verbiage regarding items that are not endorsed by the payee that has to be included in the depositing bank's endorsement before a paying bank won't return it for "no endorsement"? Currently our proof machine endorsement shows our routing number and our bank's name and city. It doesn't say PEG. But if it wasn't endorsed in the first place, that is moot anyway, isn't it? Typically, when a bank returns an item for "no endorsement," we stamp it with a Credit to the Account of the Within Named Payee, Absence of Endorsement Guaranteed and send it back through. From what I have seen in the UCC that is the required verbiage.

As a rule, we are only reviewing large items drawn on us for endorsement. I think we should be returning more of them for lack of endorsement, but I am not sure, and limited stress in the past was put on the importance of a payee endorsement if the depositing bank's endorsement was on it even if it looked like ours.

Answer: If the item is payable to an individual or a single entity, you can safely pay it without an endorsement because under UCC 4-205, the bank that sends it through without an endorsement is warranting to you that the funds were paid to the customer or deposited into the customer's account. No special language is necessary to invoke this warranty. In fact, NO language is needed to invoke it. It is automatic by statute. If the item is payable to joint payees, however, this statute may not protect you adequately and items without the endorsement of all joint payees should be returned.

In reviewing only large items drawn on you for endorsement, you are simply taking a business risk -- believing that the risk of endorsement problems on smaller items is outweighed by the cost you would incur if you reviewed all those items. It's a good idea to check a random sample of endorsements on items below the cut-off amount.

Originally appeared in the Oklahoma Bankers Association Compliance Informer.

First published on BankersOnline.com 8/20/01




Open the newly required
"UAD" .XML appraisals
Download Free UAD Reader


Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.