Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store Read A Reg Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

e-Card Exchange

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

HR Corner

Infovault

Launch Pad

Regulator Roadmaps

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

BOL Toolbar

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 


About Our Sponsors
About Us




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!

Deposits On Behalf Of The Customer & "Less Cash"
by Mary Beth Guard, BOL Guru

Question: If someone comes in to make a deposit on behalf of a customer and the deposit has "less cash" would it be better for us to get the person whom we give the cash to sign the cash out ticket or check itself? Some have suggested they sign the back of the check under the customer's signature. We do that when the entire check is being cashed, but not for a partial deposit. There has never been a policy addressing this issue before and we wanted to see what would best CYA in this case.

Answer: That's a good question. My feeling is that it would be better to have the person who is taking the cash out sign the cash out ticket. My reason for this is because signing the back of the check makes the person liable as an accommodation signer, and that doesn't seem quite appropriate. Plus, if the person taking the cash doesn't have an account at your bank, there's no easy way to take advantage of the accommodation endorsement anyway. Seems to me that the objective is to document who got the cash and having the individual sign the cash out ticket accomplishes this.

The original version appeared in the June 2002 edition of the Oklahoma Bankers Association Compliance Informer.

First published on BankersOnline.com 10/14/02




Open the newly required
"UAD" .XML appraisals
Download Free UAD Reader


Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.