Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us





Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



When "Unauthorized" are Authorized -- What Then?
Answer by John Burnett, BOL Guru
Guru Bios

Question: Customer comes in to file three "unauthorized" transactions claims on his account where his debit card number was given out and the debit card is still in his possession. We required the customer to contact the vendor/merchant to see if they will issue a credit.

On transaction #1 customer states that he had been a member of the service offered since May 2004. Upon contacting the company they would not issue refund but cancelled all future service.

On transaction #2 Customer states that upon contacting company they stated that the customer initiated the contact and said that he had agreed to the terms and conditions. They refunded 75% of the last monthly charge and cancelled the service.

On transaction #3 he contacted the Company and they also said he had agreed to the terms and conditions. They refunded 75% of the last monthly charge and cancelled service.

Based on the above information are we liable under Reg. E or under VISA regulations to refund the balance of the 3 transactions?

Answer: The only question here is whether your customer in fact authorized any of these recurring charges. My gut tells me he did, and I can bet yours is doing the same. I think you have a strong argument that the customer authorized the transfers and you can deny the claims. Visa rules permit you to do the same.

On the chance that you decide that your customer didn't authorize the charges -- let's say your customer's got a teenager and the services are for things like music downloads and access to Web game sites -- you can apply the 60 day rule in §205.6 to go back and identify when the charges started and assign liability to the customer for charges posting after the end of the 60-day period. And I would not apply the Visa "zero liability" rule because the customer let the fraud go on unabated for too long.

First published on BankersOnline.com 1/16/06




Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.