Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us





Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Contesting a Stopped Cashier's Check
Ken Golliher, BOL Guru
Guru Bios

Question:  We received a cashier's check that was returned "stop payment." We were under the impression that 6 months needed to transpire before putting a stop payment on a cashier's check. If this is the case, is there a way we can dispute the check being returned?

Answer:  If this cashier's check has been replaced under UCC § 3-312 the correct reason for return should have been more explanatory; e.g. "previously paid under declaration of loss" or "previously paid under 3-312." Do not assume that the check has been replaced following statutory procedures, and proceed as if it was not. If the check is less than 90 days old, you know statutory procedures were not followed.

Returning it to you "payment stopped" is a clear indicator that the bank doesn't have a clue and it's an invitation for you to file suit. Your first recourse is against the customer who passed the check to you. If I was unable to obtain the funds from my customer, I would respond to the other bank by having my bank's attorney write them and let them know of our plans to accept the invitation.

First published on BankersOnline.com 8/14/06




Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.