Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us





Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!



Cashier's Check Lost in Mail - Reissue a New One?

by John Burnett, BOL Guru
Guru Bio

Question:  I have a question regarding the reissue of a cashier's check. We closed a CD for a customer and mailed the monies via cashier's check. The check is lost in the mail. Since the bank is the purchaser, can I reissue the check with the customer signing an affidavit of lost check? What is our liability?

Answer:  If the check is replaced with another cashier's check, both of the checks are liabilities that the bank must honor if presented by a person entitled to enforce them. If presented for payment directly by the payee, you could refuse to cash the original check, since you had replaced it, but if the check is presented by someone other than the payee (for instance, by another bank), you'd be liable on the check, whether it was the original check or the replacement. In other words, you can't refuse payment. Take a look at your state's version of Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Look for section 3-312 (4-403 in New York). Read it through carefully. Although the language in your state might differ, the standard wording indicates that the claimant has to have had possession of the check in order to make a claim. If your payee truly never received the check in question, I don't believe he or she can make the claim. That means the bank (your bank) would have to make the declaration and claim as the remitter in this case.

Once the claim is made under section 3-312, you should wait 90 days from the issue date of the original check before issuing the replacement. Then, you can refuse payment of the original if it should show up. If you can't use section 3-312 or decide to reissue before the 90 day waiting period, the UCC doesn't give you any "out" from liability on the original check if presented by a holder in due course. The best you could do is try to recover for the double payment from your customer. Some banks in such a situation would attempt to limit their risk by requiring that the customer provide an indemnity bond or other security. That's an expensive thing to obtain (sometimes it can't be done). Other banks weigh the risk that the original check will pop up and may decide to replace the check in spite of the risk.

First published on BankersOnline.com 1/28/08




Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.