Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network

   

















    Site Map

    Our Sponsors

    Home













Compliance Gurus
Lending Gurus
Operations Gurus
Marketing Gurus
Technology Gurus
eBanking Gurus

Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!

Should you inform an employee they are being investigated?
Answer by Andy Zavoina and Ken Golliher, BOL Gurus

Question: Regarding alerting employees to being suspects of investigations as a result of SAR filings, I know we cannot disclose the existence of the SAR, however, but do we have a duty to inform our employee that an investigation is now focused upon them which would activate the need for legal representation, or would the safe harbor also apply in this case?

Answer by Andy Zavoina:
BIO AND CONTACT INFO

Telling someone they are being investigated could impede the investigation itself and any evidence pertaining to it. At some point you will likely interview the employee. They should figure it out at that point.

The safe harbor attained from the SAR filing does not effect your investigation per se, but the fact that a SAR was filed and you alerted law enforcement to the possibility of a crime.

Answer by Ken Golliher:
BIO AND CONTACT INFO

You do not have a duty to notify an employee that he is being investigated; no jeopardy attaches when a bank considers someone as a suspect. The state's (law enforcement's) identification of someone as a suspect imposes greater responsibilities. In addition, if you tell an employee that you suspect him of abusing his position you simultaneously tell him you are going to file a SAR - the law requires you to file a SAR in that circumstance.

Although banks are prohibited from disclosing SAR filings, even in court, a good defense attorney can ask the bank employee/witness to review the SAR filing requirements. Then she can ask the bank employee to review the facts in the instant case, thus using the bank employee to make it plain the bank probably believed it was legally required to file a SAR. She doesn't really have to ask you if you filed a SAR to make it plain that you did.

First published on BankersOnline.com 9/2/03





Home | Compliance | Lending | Operations | Security | Marketing | Technology | eBanking
BOL Archives    Privacy Policy    Important Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.