Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch
Em@il Education

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us




Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!


Debit Card Fraud - Refunding Customer's Money
by John Burnett, BOL Guru
Guru Bios

Question: Several of our customer accounts were recently accessed through a fraud scheme where fraudulent debit cards were produced and used to access the accounts. The bank has refunded the customers' money. A recent article on MSNBC implied that banks were not required to refund the money. Can you clarify this issue?

Answer: I believe the MSNBC article left out some important information. I firmly believe that the customer is not liable for unauthorized transfers effected by means of bogus debit card copies.

If the bogus cards are fabricated using "skimmed" card data that are pirated from mag stripes on legitimate cards (ATM add-on, card leaves customer at gas station or restaurant, etc.), the card that's used for the unauthorized transfers isn't an accepted access device; the customer cannot be liable. If the fraudulent cards are manufactured using data phished from the customer, that's deception, and giving up one's access device data in a fraud scam is not an authorization under Regulation E.

In the unlikely event there is a series of related unauthorized transfers and they extend over a long period of time, you might be able to lay off some of the liability on your customer under the "after 60 days from statement delivery" rule in section 205.6 of Regulation E. But that only addresses the transactions that take place after the end of that 60-day period. Most of the fraudulent card scams involve quick hits over one or two days, and then the card is tossed.

First published on BankersOnline.com 3/20/06



Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.