Click to return to BOL home page
Banker Store eCard Exchange Vendor Connect Career Connect Learning Connect Bankers Information Network
 

Support for BOL is provided by:

MAIN CONTENT 
Compliance

    Agency Road Maps

    Alphabet Soup

    Compliance Tools

    FACTA/FCRA

    OFAC

Lending

    FACTA/FCRA

    Lending Tools

    SCRA

Marketing

Operations

    Check 21

    Operations Tools

    SAR Resrch Guide

Security

    AML/BSA

    Bank Robbery

    Counterfeits

    ID Fraud/Phishing

    Security Tools

Technology/eBanking

    Info Security


SPECIAL AREAS 
BOL Archives

BOL Blogs

Briefing Archive

Calendar

Court Watch

Examiner's Corner

Executive Briefing

Infovault

Launch Pad

Risk Management

Site Map

Site Orientation

Top Stories


~ ~ ~
SERVICES 
CrimeDex

Em@il Education

ID Verification

Record Retention


~ ~ ~
SHOP 

Banker Store

Bankers Info Ntwk
Vendor Connect

CONNECT 

Career Connect

Learning Connect

Vendor Connect

Guru Central

INTERACT 

Ask a Guru
Bankers Threads

Contact Us

Give Us Feedback


TOOLS 

BOL Toolbar

60 Second Solutions

Alphabet Soup

Banker Tools

BOL Forms

FUN 

BOL Recipes

eCard Exchange

LEARN MORE 

About Advertising
About Our Sponsors
About Us





Print Friendly! Email This Article! Discuss NOW!


Reg E - Periodic Statements
Answer by John Burnett, BOL Guru
Guru Bio

Question:  We are looking for some clarification on Reg E - 205.9 on periodic statements. In section (a) it talks about what is required on the receipt from a merchant, then in (b) when it is talking about the periodic statements, the requirement (v) says the name of any third party to or from whom funds were transferred. We have several merchants in the area that are passing just an address in the field captured by the core product and not putting an actual name. Is the merchant, such as ABC Company, considered the third party, and is the company name required on the statement? The item appears with date, amount, terminal ID number, location, but does not necessarily say the business name.


Answer:  If you are describing a POS entry, where funds pass from the customer's account to the merchant, the merchant's name (either corporate name or d/b/a name) must appear. There are a number of ways that can work. It need not be separately given if it is already listed as part of the terminal location, for example.

However, there is some wiggle room in the Official Staff Interpretations (Commentary) to section 205.9(b). Specifically, Comment 1 to section 205.9(b)(1) - Transaction information, says "While financial institutions must maintain reasonable procedures to ensure the integrity of data obtained from another institution, a merchant, or other third parties, verification of each transfer that appears on the periodic statement is not required." That doesn't say you don't have to be concerned about the merchant name, but it does suggest that if it's missing from time to time you shouldn't pull your hair out over it.

In my experience most merchants were passing all the needed information along, but there are a number of systems that touch POS entries, especially those that are signature-based. Each of those systems has its own template for location data, and when they don't all agree on field locations and definitions, things can get dropped out. If you are consistently missing specific information from location records, contact your servicer with specific examples and ask for help in getting the correct data. At least have a copy of such a request in your files, and you should be all right with your examiners.

First published on BankersOnline.com 6/22/09







Privacy Policy    Disclaimer   Recommend This Site !   Contact Us


BankersOnline is a free service made possible by the generous support of our advertisers and sponsors. Advertisers and sponsors are not responsible for site content. Please help us keep BankersOnline FREE to all banking professionals. Support our advertisers and sponsors by clicking through to learn more about their products and services.