Thread Options
|
#1196180 - 06/04/09 07:48 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Patsy Cline
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,389
Looking for My Happy Place....
|
Email training - that is FUNNY!
Another question - well, looking for verification really.
On Section 32 loans, all the MDIA provisions apply plus you have to make the HOEPA disclosure 3 business days prior to closing - Is this correct?
And.........if (this is so crazy) you happen to have a HOEPA loan where the borrower feels they have a bona fide financial emergency - would they then have to waive (assuming you sent corrected disclosures as well) all THREE waiting periods??????
(I'm not even going to get into rescission, because that would make it FOUR!)
Am I thinking to hard about this?
I need an aspirin.
_________________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? ~ Dr. R Schuller
My opinion only.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196183 - 06/04/09 07:50 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Tigg
|
10K Club
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
|
It isn't only the borrower who may 'feel' they have a bona fide reason. The bank should agree. I don't think you can waive the 3 day HOEPA disclosure requirement, though.
_________________________
My Opinions Only
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196196 - 06/04/09 08:01 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Skittles
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
I agree with Skittles, we don't make HOEPA loans, so I didn't look it up, but memory says there is no "out" on HOEPA waiting periods...regardless...most of us who have been in banking forEVER have MAYBE seen one instance of a true bonafide emergency...it really just doesn't happen!
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196197 - 06/04/09 08:01 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Skittles
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,389
Looking for My Happy Place....
|
Under 226.31(c)(iii) there is a waiver - or maybe I'm reading the reg wrong?
226.31 (c) has the timing of disclosures for 226.32
And yes, the bank would have to agree with the financial emergency (I made that an assumption - sorry).
I know this is a worst case scenario, but living in a hurricane prone area, I wonder about this.
_________________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? ~ Dr. R Schuller
My opinion only.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196232 - 06/04/09 08:34 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
RR Joker
|
Power Poster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,351
|
I agree with Skittles, we don't make HOEPA loans, so I didn't look it up, but memory says there is no "out" on HOEPA waiting periods...regardless...most of us who have been in banking forEVER have MAYBE seen one instance of a true bonafide emergency...it really just doesn't happen! The only loans we underwrite that are subject to HOEPA are loans where the borrower wants to purchase credit insurance. Do you offer credit insurance? And if you do, if the insurance purchase throws the loan into HOEPA status, do you just inform the borrower that credit insurance is not available?
_________________________
The more you sweat in training, the less you bleed in battle.......
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196236 - 06/04/09 08:35 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
swiggles
|
10K Club
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
|
We don't sell credit insurance on real estate loans because it generally bumps the customer into HOEPA status.
_________________________
My Opinions Only
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196239 - 06/04/09 08:36 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Jodi
|
Gold Star
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 299
|
Does anyone know the penalties for violations? I know someone is going to ask this in training.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196246 - 06/04/09 08:41 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Skittles
|
Power Poster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,351
|
We don't sell credit insurance on real estate loans because it generally bumps the customer into HOEPA status. So your management actually agrees to miss out on a fee opportunity just so you won't have a loan subject to HOEPA? What's the big stigma about having loans on your books (and on your LAR) subject to HOEPA? Credit insurance is easy to sell for real estate loans (especially homestead property) and the premiums in some cases are huge. Sometimes when we inform a borrower that there will be an additional three day waiting period due to the decision to purchase credit insurance, the borrower changes his/her mind.
_________________________
The more you sweat in training, the less you bleed in battle.......
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196353 - 06/04/09 10:56 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Jerod Moyer
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,726
|
OK - I have read this whole thread, but am begging for a confirmation that the ONLY things changing on 7/30/09 are the following:
1. E-TIL on a consumer purpose loan secured by a dwelling. 2. E-TIL before any fees (besides credit report) can be charged. 3. New language required on E-TIL 4. Provide E-TIL add 7 -substanially open business days until first potential closing date. If APR on E-TIL is accurate, close loan; If APR on E-TIL is out of tolerance - must re-disclose and wait either 3 (not Sun or legal holidays) days plus 3 more (not Sun or legal holiday days) if corrected TIL sent by mail.
Does that sound right?
_________________________
It's not that I take life for granted. It's only that the good won't make it. Innocence dies, while Villany Thrives.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196433 - 06/05/09 12:04 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Tesla
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,701
PA
|
I believe the seven-day waiting period is the "more precise" definition of business day. The only thing (I think) that uses the other definition is the original three days after application to provide the ETIL.
_________________________
Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196468 - 06/05/09 12:58 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Deena
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,533
Bloomington, IN
|
That is correct.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196503 - 06/05/09 01:30 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Deena
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,726
|
Oh - then I am confused. Receive application and deliver E-TIL at that time; wait 7 precise business days. Is that correct? Receive application and mail E-TIL within 3 substantially open business days, then wait 7 precise business days. Is that correct? I am sorry I am so dense.
_________________________
It's not that I take life for granted. It's only that the good won't make it. Innocence dies, while Villany Thrives.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196511 - 06/05/09 01:38 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Tesla
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,533
Bloomington, IN
|
The "substantial" business days is when you are required to deliver the initial early disclosures.
If you mail the disclosures then you must wait 7 precise business day to close. You can close on the 7th business day. This rule is like the HOEPA rule and not the rescission rule.
If you have to redisclose and mail the new disclosure then it is 3 precise business days before they are considered received and then another 3 precise business days before you can close.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1196536 - 06/05/09 02:04 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
Dan Persfull
|
Gold Star
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 289
|
Good morning. Has anyone worked through the tolerance rules for REg Z and how to best implement a redisclosure process? Seems to me that we must measure off of a finance charge tolerance of $35 rather than merely watching the APR. I'm wondering if the bank plans to sell the loan on the secondary market if we could take advantage of the additional tolerances in 226.23(g) since for loans sold we wouldn't have the more limited tolerance that would apply in a foreclosure situation. ___________ The opinions expressed by me are not the opinions of my employer and should not be considered legal advice.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1197122 - 06/06/09 07:38 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
3-2-Go
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
|
The new HUD and GFE are governed by RESPA and that date has not changed.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1197128 - 06/07/09 02:16 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
3-2-Go
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,763
Central City, NE
|
Are the Reg Z changes that were to be effective 10/01/09 now to be in play by 07/30/09? (the new HUD / GFE) Randy's right but let me add: The MDIA rules (7/30/09) overlap the Reg Z changes (10/1/09) concerning P-TIL disclosures. The 10/1/09 amendments effect many other things (high priced mortgages, advertising and more). Then we have RESPA changes 1/1/10.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1198008 - 06/09/09 04:58 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
RUKiddingMe
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 767
|
I have looked every where, can someone tell me if a single pay loan is considered an irregular payment for the tolerance test (1/4%)? I know I am going to need to provide examples of these and the only one that seems to fit the definition is a construction loan...help appreciated!
_________________________
Comments are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1198031 - 06/09/09 05:16 PM
Re: New Reg Z Final Rule - Just Published
David Dickinson
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 767
|
Thank you David.
_________________________
Comments are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|