Skip to content
GeoDataVision
Thread Options Tools
#1219 - 04/05/01 03:07 PM Flood
Christy Offline
New Poster
Christy
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 24
Fort Collins, CO USA
We are doing a loan where our collateral is an assignment of note and deed of trust. Do we need to do a flood determination on the property we are taking the assignment of and if so and it is in a flood zone, how do we determine how much flood insurance to obtain?


Return to Top
General Discussion
#1220 - 04/06/01 04:17 AM Re: Flood
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,542
On the Net
If your collateral is the note receivable your customer has with someone else, you do not. I had to research this before, but I can't put my hands on the source document right now.

Personally, from a safety and soundness perspective, that dirt may be your underlying collateral and should, in my opinion, be checked and insured if need be.

But since that dirt is not your actual collateral, the answer is no.

------------------
Andy Zavoina
Opinions stated are not necessarily that of my employer.

_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
#1221 - 04/06/01 04:48 AM Re: Flood
Anonymous
Unregistered

We asked our attorney about this a while back and they agreed with Andy. Strictly speaking, an assignment of note and deed of trust does not require flood insurance. However, the more conservative, and possibly more prudent approach is to require it. Our bank does. Just be consistent. Otherwise questions may be raised when flood insurance is required for one loan and not for another.

You would determine how much flood insurance to require in the same way you would if you took a trust deed rather than an assignment.


Return to Top
#1222 - 04/06/01 03:08 AM Re: Flood
Lucy Griffin Offline

Diamond Poster
Lucy Griffin
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,544
Flood is a topic that is not always wise or safe to follow the finely reasoned legal opinions. Andy's lawyer is probably right, BUT your examiner's opinion is the one that counts. I have recently heard of several instances where examiners have written up banks for not having flood cert forms in the loan participation file. The examiners have penalized the banks and required the participating bank to perform a flood cert if the loan originator will not provide it. This clearly goes beyond the regulation's literal requirements but illustrates the level of importance Flood is being given by the regulators. The wisest policy is to require the cert and, if appropriate, proof of insurance.

Return to Top