Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 94 of 94 1 2 92 93 94
Thread Options
#1367981 - 04/01/10 05:34 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
raitchjay Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,103
OK
I don't understand how you can be stuck for a charge that isn't incurred. If I do list OTI on the GFE and it isn't purchased....is it showing up on the HUD-1? To me, i would be stuck if i failed to list it on the GFE, and the borrower wants to and does purchase it. Then it would be a cure situation. We're a title exam state, so it's not that it's seller paid or borrower paid...it isn't, in most cases, being purchased at all. (Again, i understand it still needs to be quoted, thus my statement about being a technical violation if omitted.) If i don't list it and it isn't purchased...how is that a problem? 10% tolerance...ok....i have the fee i showed on my GFE (nothing) and the actual cost incurred on the HUD-1 (nothing). Where's the cure? I may be wrong; if so, someone please provide me guidance on where it says this in the regulation.
Last edited by raitchjay; 04/01/10 05:48 PM.
_________________________
I'm fixin' to fix that.

Return to Top
RESPA
#1368003 - 04/01/10 05:58 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 raitchjay
ComplianceJungle Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 40
In short, there is nothing we can do to cure. Note the price of the homeowners insurance on the HUD1 and list $0 for the OTI since they aren't going to buy it. The OTI is still going to be a violation since it wasn't noted. Is that correct?

Thanks

Return to Top
#1368014 - 04/01/10 06:07 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 ComplianceJungle
raitchjay Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,103
OK
I stick with my first answer til proven otherwise jungle. Yes, i think it's a violation to not list OTI on a purchase transaction, but if the customer doesn't purchase it, to me there's nothing to cure.
_________________________
I'm fixin' to fix that.

Return to Top
#1368021 - 04/01/10 06:13 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 raitchjay
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
I agree...it's a technical error, but won't skew your tolerance as zero and zero will wash out!
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1368023 - 04/01/10 06:14 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 raitchjay
Dan Persfull Online
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,529
Bloomington, IN
Omitting the OTI from the GFE on a purchase transaction would be a Sec 5 violation under the new rules IMO and for this particular violation there is no cure. You can't issue a revised GFE because there is no chaged circumstance.

If you disclose $0.00 on the GFE and $0.00 on the HUD then they wash each other out the same as disclosing $500 and $500 so there would be no 10% tolerance to cure, unless of course all the other charges exceeded the 10% of their totals.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#1368052 - 04/01/10 06:42 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Dan Persfull
ComplianceJungle Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 40
Since there is no tolerance regarding the homeowners insurance, we should be ok, right? Just making sure.

Thanks

Return to Top
#1368077 - 04/01/10 07:03 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 ComplianceJungle
raitchjay Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,103
OK
As far as refunding any money to the customer, yes, you should be ok. There's an unlimited tolerance for Block 11.
_________________________
I'm fixin' to fix that.

Return to Top
#1403750 - 06/15/10 03:43 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Jan94
Deena Offline
Power Poster
Deena
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,701
PA
Last edited by Deena; 06/15/10 05:00 PM. Reason: Started a separate thread
_________________________
Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer.

Return to Top
Page 94 of 94 1 2 92 93 94

Moderator:  QCL