Thread Options
|
#1291598 - 11/23/09 06:26 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
pjs
|
Power Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,559
Foxboro
|
Thanks pjs. Seems like for our situation, the list of providers is no longer needed since we do not allow the borrower to choose the appraiser, credit co, closing agent and mi company.
_________________________
Best QB Ever. Worst Defense Ever.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291775 - 11/23/09 07:51 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
TB 12
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
|
Has anyone thought about documenting the applicant's intent to proceed with the application before starting the verification process? David's RESPA training commented on this and that was the first I had heard of it.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291780 - 11/23/09 07:55 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
AmyH
|
100 Club
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 129
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
Can someone clarify with me please? Average charges...
The reg says "the average amount paid for a settlement service by one settlement service provider to another settlement service provider".
So does this mean if I used average charge for my appraisers, that I would need a separate average charge for each appraiser?
Or does it mean I can average the charges for all of my appraisers together for the same type of appraisal?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291791 - 11/23/09 08:07 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Carter's Mom
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Oklahoma
|
I think you can say more than one appraiser. I am basing this off of the word "providers" (plural) in the last sentence of the paragraph below.
3500.8(b)(2) Use of average charge. “(i) The average charge for a settlement service shall be no more than the average amount paid for a settlement service by one settlement service provider to another settlement service provider on behalf of borrowers and sellers for a particular class of transactions involving federally related mortgage loans. The total amounts paid by borrowers and sellers for a settlement service based on the use of an average charge may not exceed the total amounts paid to the providers of that service for the particular class of transactions."
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291824 - 11/23/09 08:37 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
AmyH
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,321
oHiO
|
Has anyone thought about documenting the applicant's intent to proceed with the application before starting the verification process? David's RESPA training commented on this and that was the first I had heard of it. David recommended a cover letter included with the GFE and P-TIL and anything else you are providing to the borrower. State in the letter ~ if you wish to proceed with the loan application, please provide (list the verification documents) as well as a check for (whatever $ amount you want as a deposit). If the borrower brings you these items they are expressing their intent to proceed.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291825 - 11/23/09 08:40 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
AmyH
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,763
Central City, NE
|
Has anyone thought about documenting the applicant's intent to proceed with the application before starting the verification process? David's RESPA training commented on this and that was the first I had heard of it. The reg is clear you must have delivered the GFE AND received intent from the consumer before they can be charged any fees and before you ask them for any verification documents. If you read the entire preamble, HUD makes it clear they want disclosures to the applicant quickly, but they want borrower's to be able to slow down the process to shop. I believe you send a cover letter with the GFE/P-TIL and inform the borrower what you need to proceed. If they provide it, they are expressing their intent to proceed. No need for a signature or disclosure. You might also have a checklist the LO completes that indicates they talked to the borrower. This will be something we'll have to wait and see how the examiners interpret. BTW, FAQ #28 (in the GFE-General section, added 11/19/09) states "acknowledgment of receipt of a GFE, by itself does not constitute an expression of t an intention to proceed with the loan covered by the GFE."
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291827 - 11/23/09 08:41 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Jenn-Lynn
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Oklahoma
|
I think the 11/19/09 FAQs back this up by saying (Average Charges, Question 4, page 31) that the calculation is based on "the average amount paid for the settlement service for the particular class of transaction..."
I think the emphasis is on the service. HUD did not expressly prohibit having more than one provider in a service calculation. This Q & A also reiterates that "HUD does not prescribe a particular method for calculating the average charge..."
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291859 - 11/23/09 09:12 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
David Dickinson
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 69
|
Has anyone thought about documenting the applicant's intent to proceed with the application before starting the verification process? David's RESPA training commented on this and that was the first I had heard of it. The reg is clear you must have delivered the GFE AND received intent from the consumer before they can be charged any fees and before you ask them for any verification documents. If you read the entire preamble, HUD makes it clear they want disclosures to the applicant quickly, but they want borrower's to be able to slow down the process to shop. I believe you send a cover letter with the GFE/P-TIL and inform the borrower what you need to proceed. If they provide it, they are expressing their intent to proceed. No need for a signature or disclosure. You might also have a checklist the LO completes that indicates they talked to the borrower. This will be something we'll have to wait and see how the examiners interpret. BTW, FAQ #28 (in the GFE-General section, added 11/19/09) states "acknowledgment of receipt of a GFE, by itself does not constitute an expression of t an intention to proceed with the loan covered by the GFE." We often have in-person mortgage applications where the borrower is bringing in verification documents. We plan on documenting in our procedures that the issuance of the GFE is not conditional on the verification documents and the fee check is the "intent to proceed" but are you saying that after we hand over the GFE, we cannot take those verification docs they have brought in? Do we have to literally send them away and only get those verification documents along with the "intent to proceed" (i.e., the fee check)?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291890 - 11/23/09 09:39 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Jenn-Lynn
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
|
Is the revised Special Information Booklet available to order yet?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291932 - 11/23/09 10:28 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Carter's Mom
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,568
New Jersey
|
Can someone clarify with me please? Average charges...
The reg says "the average amount paid for a settlement service by one settlement service provider to another settlement service provider".
So does this mean if I used average charge for my appraisers, that I would need a separate average charge for each appraiser?
Or does it mean I can average the charges for all of my appraisers together for the same type of appraisal? I don't know about the rest of you, but most of our appraisal firms have tiered pricing, based on the value of the property. Because of that, we can not use the average pricing method. According to the Q&A, an average charge may not be used where the charge for the service is based on the property value. And since we will not know at the time of providing the GFE which appraisal firm will get the assignment, I'm not sure what figure we will use for an appraisal fee.
_________________________
Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. Peter Drucker
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291948 - 11/23/09 10:55 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
David Dickinson
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,601
Ohio
|
Sorry, I still don't understand. We close our own loans on hold them in our portfolio so there is no YSP. We charge a 1% fee but the broker charges them 1.50%, so the borrower is charged 2.50%. How do we list that? I've also been reading some more on the broker deals. If I understand what I am reading, the broker is the one that actually would be preparing the GFE and then we have to live with the fees they quoted? Does a broker usually know what institution they are having the borrower go to for financing to even be able to quote our fees? As you can tell I know nothing about broker deals.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1291965 - 11/23/09 11:20 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
jlroberts
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,763
Central City, NE
|
Sorry, I still don't understand. We close our own loans on hold them in our portfolio so there is no YSP. We charge a 1% fee but the broker charges them 1.50%, so the borrower is charged 2.50%. How do we list that? Just because you close and hold the loans doesn't mean there isn't a YSP. A YSP is the fee you pay to the broker. They MUST be disclosed on the GFE/HUD-1. I've also been reading some more on the broker deals. If I understand what I am reading, the broker is the one that actually would be preparing the GFE and then we have to live with the fees they quoted? Crazy, but true. Does a broker usually know what institution they are having the borrower go to for financing to even be able to quote our fees? As you can tell I know nothing about broker deals. That depends on your brokers and your institution. You'll need to discuss this with your lenders.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1292130 - 11/24/09 02:54 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
RR Joker
|
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Omaha, Nebraska
|
Becky originally posted this question and i didnt see a response and we are in the same boat. How are people addressing this situation? "Becky S. Can someone direct me to finding an answer to the following: On construction/perms we may do several inspections throughout the construction phase. Sometimes the inspections are done by bank staff and sometime by an appraisers. We typically charged a fee per inspection - can we just increase our origination fee and eliminate the inspections fee?"
Also, along the same lines, for each disbursement, we get a disbursement endorsement from the title company. How can we determine an amount to put with the title fees if we are uncertain with how many draws or disbursement endorsements we will need?
Last edited by Em; 11/24/09 02:55 PM.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1292174 - 11/24/09 03:21 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Em
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,474
Midwest
|
Does anyone know if we can purchase the settlement cost booklet yet? What is the link. For some reason, I can't find it.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1292192 - 11/24/09 03:34 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
ahkcompliance
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,321
oHiO
|
Does anyone know if we can purchase the settlement cost booklet yet? What is the link. For some reason, I can't find it. You don't want to purchase the books when you can order them through the HUD website for no fee. I tried to pre-order from HUD but they told me that the books were not ready and to call back the first week of 1-2010 to see if they were done. Our loan software dealer is trying to get us to buy the books from them. They are not cheap. We are going through HUD when the books are done.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1292215 - 11/24/09 03:47 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
pjs
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,474
Midwest
|
Thanks!
I am going through the GFE and in block three do we need to seperate the flood fee out into initial and LOL? On the old GFE, we have always seperated out the intial fee and life of loan monitoring fee since the LOL is a prepaid finance charge.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1292263 - 11/24/09 04:12 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
pjs
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,474
Midwest
|
We have been told in the past to seperate out since one is a prepaid finance charge so now I wonder if we will still need to seperate.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|