Thread Options
|
#1336026 - 02/02/10 08:23 PM
An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,121
|
"The United States was, and still is, at war with al Qaeda," Mr. Bharara argued. "And because the group does not control territory as a sovereign nation does, the war effort relies less on deterrence than on disruption—on preventing attacks before they can occur. At the core of such disruption efforts is obtaining accurate intelligence about al Qaeda's plans, leaders and capabilities."
"[The suspect was] a rare find, and his then-recent interactions with top-level al Qaeda terrorists made him a potentially rich source of information that was both urgent and crucial to our nation's war efforts."
"The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 . . . naturally resulted in a heightened focus on intelligence gathering to preempt another attack. When the United States took custody of the [suspect] . . . and it justifiably believed that he had actionable intelligence that could be used to save lives, [the administration could have] opted to treat him initially as an intelligence asset."
"the interest in national security plainly justified holding the defendant in this case as an enemy combatant, interrogating him, and prosecuting him for violations of the laws of war, even if that meant delaying his criminal trial."
WSJ op-ed
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336031 - 02/02/10 08:26 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
straw
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,068
Fortress of Solitude
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ warmongerer. No compassion
_________________________
"Beneath an ever watchful eye...the angels of the temple fly"
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336093 - 02/02/10 09:04 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
TheManofSteel
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
no arguement here...........
the admin really has blundered greatly in this criminal trial stuff....
their ideology blinded them.........
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336148 - 02/02/10 09:47 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Pale Rider
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,050
Tulsa, Ok
|
I really don't have a problem with torture as far is terrorists are concerned. I think that if you put yourself in that position, you deserve what you get. Guilty by association.
_________________________
It takes a long time but God dies too, but not before he'll stick it to you. - Issac Brock
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336151 - 02/02/10 09:51 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Spivol
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,068
Fortress of Solitude
|
I really don't have a problem with torture as far is terrorists are concerned. I think that if you put yourself in that position, you deserve what you get. Guilty by association. It may shock you Spivol, that I do not support torture. I just do not think waterboarding is torture.
_________________________
"Beneath an ever watchful eye...the angels of the temple fly"
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336267 - 02/03/10 12:45 AM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
straw
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,050
Tulsa, Ok
|
Blade, it doesn't shock me at all. Why would it? I agree that "waterboarding" isn't torture, though. I would say cutting off a thumb would be torture.
_________________________
It takes a long time but God dies too, but not before he'll stick it to you. - Issac Brock
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336271 - 02/03/10 01:48 AM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Spivol
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,395
Jersey Shore
|
I agree that "waterboarding" isn't torture, though. Fascinating. Why do you think waterboarding isn't torture?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336319 - 02/03/10 01:35 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Spivol
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,395
Jersey Shore
|
You might read Waterboarding is Torture… Period , written by Malcolm Nance, a former Master Instructor and Chief of Training at the US Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape School (SERE). Any further discussion probably belongs in a separate thread since it is a significant departure from the thread title.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336364 - 02/03/10 02:08 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
straw
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,567
Ohio
|
Just for the record, this argument was made by the Obama administration's justice department on December 18, 2009 in a case in the Southern District of New York.
I don't have problem with interrogation. I have a problem with torture, or for you Cheney fans "enhanced interrogation."
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336367 - 02/03/10 02:09 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,989
|
::snark detector activated::
_________________________
With the lights out, it's less dangerous.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336370 - 02/03/10 02:10 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,994
|
I prefer enhanced torture (no ball gag though)
_________________________
blah
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336372 - 02/03/10 02:12 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
A_G
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,858
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
The family of the underwear bomber has been brought to the US by the FBI to convince him to talk...I wonder if his father and mother beating the living daylights out of him for his stupidity would be considered torture
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336469 - 02/03/10 03:09 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
HappyGilmore
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,567
Ohio
|
It’s true that as an investigative technique “convince the guy’s family to convince him to cooperate” isn’t quite as bad-ass as “use Khmer Rouge torture tactics against him.” On the other hand, the non-torture way actually produces reliable information. And note that these are really inconsistent ideas. A family that has confidence in the basic fairness of the US criminal justice system is prepared to help the FBI secure cooperation from their son. A family that believes the US government holds suspects in “black sites” where they’re tortured and/or tries them in kangaroo courts is much less likely to cooperate. - Matt Yglesias
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336471 - 02/03/10 03:11 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,989
|
"Cocaine is like really evil coffee." - Courtney Love
_________________________
With the lights out, it's less dangerous.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336531 - 02/03/10 03:46 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,121
|
Just for the record, this argument was made by the Obama administration's justice department on December 18, 2009 in a case in the Southern District of New York.
I don't have problem with interrogation. I have a problem with torture, or for you Cheney fans "enhanced interrogation." So the administration argues that it was the right thing to do with this terrorist, excuse me, suspect, to interrogate, no miranda, no lawyer, but it was also the right thing to do with the latest terrorist, excuse me, suspect, to be miradized 50 minutes after he was captured, excuse me, arrested? [good thing we don't have an administration that flip-flops. Lord only knows what the implications could be]
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336534 - 02/03/10 03:49 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
straw
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,567
Ohio
|
Who is the suspect in question for the Dec. 18 2009 filing? Where was he picked up? That changes a few things.
And with Abdulmutallabh he was mirandized after it was determined there were no other threats or coordinating actions.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336546 - 02/03/10 03:54 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,121
|
Who is the suspect in question for the Dec. 18 2009 filing? Where was he picked up? That changes a few things.
And with Abdulmutallabh he was mirandized after it was determined there were no other threats or coordinating actions. And you know this how?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336595 - 02/03/10 04:22 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
straw
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,567
Ohio
|
Was on the news this morning.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336601 - 02/03/10 04:27 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Buccs
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,068
Fortress of Solitude
|
Was on the news this morning. source por favor
_________________________
"Beneath an ever watchful eye...the angels of the temple fly"
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336614 - 02/03/10 04:33 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Miscuit
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,858
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
George Nouri reporting from the high desert?
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336623 - 02/03/10 04:39 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
TheManofSteel
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,567
Ohio
|
Was on the news this morning. source por favor Will post later (firewall here)
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336637 - 02/03/10 04:49 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
Miscuit
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,989
|
Was on the news this morning. E! News? !!! MTV news?
_________________________
With the lights out, it's less dangerous.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1336684 - 02/03/10 05:14 PM
Re: An argument in favor of terrorist interrogation
A_G
|
Power Poster
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,912
Outside A Garage
|
Human Rights Watch blog
_________________________
...you guys, I'm going home
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|