Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1510027 - 02/14/11 09:44 PM HIgh Risk Customers
CC Gem Offline
New Poster
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11
Texas
We have always considered physicians to fall under professional service provider as far as our high risk customers were concerned. That idea is now being challenged and I am having difficulty in arguing this. I know the exam manual says, "acts as a intermediary between its client and the bank." Does anyone else consider them High Risk?

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#1510032 - 02/14/11 09:50 PM Re: HIgh Risk Customers CC Gem
Doug Hendrickson Offline
Power Poster
Doug Hendrickson
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,927
They are ineligible for CTR exemption due to the fact that they are involved in the "Practice of law, accountancy, or medicine". I believe there is an implication (inference?) that they are therefore "high-risk", but would appreciate hearing from others.
_________________________
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.--Confucius

Return to Top
#1510077 - 02/14/11 11:58 PM Re: HIgh Risk Customers CC Gem
Elwood P. Dowd Offline
10K Club
Elwood P. Dowd
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
Noting the language you reference, physicians, doctors, etc. very definitely do not fall under the heading of professional service provider or the slang reference, "gatekeeper." This group is made up of people who have funds in your bank that, according to your own records, do not belong to them. They are not automatically high risk, they are simply "subject to expanded examination overview;" e.g. if examiners ask you for a list of these customers you should be able to provide it.

Examples would be attorneys who have "trust" or IOLTA accounts, CPAs with "impound" funds, realtors with escrow funds, auction houses with sale proceeds, etc. In essence, you really have no idea who the money in these accounts belong to, so you darn well better know who it is that's holding the purse strings.

Being a doctor or a lawyer has little (perhaps nothing) to do with a high risk classification. The nature of the person's practice and receipts would have everything to do with it.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.

Return to Top
#1510097 - 02/15/11 03:45 AM Re: HIgh Risk Customers Elwood P. Dowd
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
As Ken has indicated, there are many "lists" of "types" of customers that may have inherent risks.

Take cash-intensive businesses for example. While cash-intensive business customers may be inherently high risk customers, not every cash-intensive business customer may be high risk. It really depends on the customer's specific activity and should be supported by a risk assessment associated with that specific customer. As such, not every cash-intensive business in an institution is or should be subjected to the same level of review.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1510253 - 02/15/11 04:30 PM Re: HIgh Risk Customers rlcarey
CC Gem Offline
New Poster
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11
Texas
Thank you for all the input!

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z