Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1514312 - 02/24/11 07:49 PM Should have pulled a new flood?
Many Hats Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 915
Orlando, FL
Scenario:

Loan secured by MFH without land closes 11/03 in husband & wife's name. Zone is X.

Husband dies and wife finds a new husband. 97 payments remain.

Loan is modified on 11/16/10 taking off deceased husband and adding new husband. Maturity is extended to make it 108 payments remaining.

A new flood was NOT pulled, but should have been...correct?

Return to Top
Flood Compliance
#1514329 - 02/24/11 08:02 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
You didn't have to pull a new one, unless required by your LOL monitoring company for tracking purposes...however, you needed to make sure the map didn't change.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514343 - 02/24/11 08:12 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Many Hats Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 915
Orlando, FL
Well, our typical method of documenting that it didn't change is to order a new one. So, should I order a new one now (which will jump out like a red flag), or is there another way we can find out?

Return to Top
#1514348 - 02/24/11 08:14 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
YOu can look it up yourself and see if it changed or not...then note on the form 'no change as of xx date'.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514361 - 02/24/11 08:33 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Skittles Offline
10K Club
Skittles
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
However if the first flood determination was pulled in November 2003 it's over 7 years old and a new determination is required.
_________________________
My Opinions Only

Return to Top
#1514382 - 02/24/11 08:51 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Skittles
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
Point!

::teach me to skim right over the date!::
Last edited by RR joker; 02/24/11 08:52 PM.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514429 - 02/24/11 09:33 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Many Hats Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 915
Orlando, FL
Just so I understand this correctly......would we have been required to pull a new flood if we were not extending the term of the loan?

Return to Top
#1514436 - 02/24/11 09:37 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
If you touched it (MIRE) you hit a trigger. Since it was modified to change names, then you hit a trigger regardless of extending the term.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514564 - 02/25/11 02:27 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Many Hats Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 915
Orlando, FL
Okay....so all we can do now is order a new flood (even though it is after the fact).

Return to Top
#1514566 - 02/25/11 02:28 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
I would.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514613 - 02/25/11 03:05 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,529
Bloomington, IN
I would have to opine they can rely on:

same property + same lender = existing determination providing all 3 factors are met. Less than 7 years old, on the SFHDF and there have been no map changes.

PS. The following will give you the current map and it is updated daily.

http://www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm
Last edited by Dan Persfull; 02/25/11 03:08 PM. Reason: Add additional comment.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#1514630 - 02/25/11 03:23 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Dan Persfull
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
(it was over 7 years)
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1514635 - 02/25/11 03:28 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,529
Bloomington, IN
Originally Posted By: RR joker
(it was over 7 years)


Point!

::teach me to skim right over the date!::



Ditto - at least I put the statement "providing the 3 factors are met". I guess that's a bit of a saving grace. blush
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#1514729 - 02/25/11 04:40 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Dan Persfull
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
yup..you definitely did better than I did! smile
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1518008 - 03/04/11 10:14 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? RR Joker
Still Smiling Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 767
I have a question regarding this topic...Do I understand this all to mean that even if you have LOL through the flood vendor and you are extending the term that either you must order a new cert or check the flood map and document yourself?

Sorry everything starts to run together this time of day!
_________________________
Comments are strictly my own and not that of my employer.

Return to Top
#1518022 - 03/04/11 10:49 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Still Smiling
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,353
Galveston, TX
Do I understand this all to mean that even if you have LOL through the flood vendor and you are extending the term that either you must order a new cert or check the flood map and document yourself?

Yes.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1518404 - 03/07/11 08:39 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? rlcarey
David Dickinson Offline
10K Club
David Dickinson
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,762
Central City, NE
Life of loan meets no regulatory requirements. It is a service to your bank. That's it.

You must still fully comply with the Flood requirements. If you make, increase, renew or extend a loan, you must pull a new SFHDF or rely on an old one if the 3 conditions are met.
_________________________
David Dickinson
http://www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top
#1662761 - 02/09/12 05:46 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RSC Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 69
I have a lender that wants to use an old flood determination to refinance the current loan and add money to it. All 3 of the conditions are met. The loan will be paid off before the seven years. I want to tell the lender no that they should oder a new one because there needs to be continued monitoring of the property. Am I correct on this or not? Appreciate any help

Return to Top
#1662771 - 02/09/12 06:05 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,353
Galveston, TX
There is no regulatory requirement to have life of loan monitoring. It is purely an investor requirement. The seven year period for use of an old FHD is at the beginning of the loan, not for the life of the loan.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1662937 - 02/09/12 07:57 PM Re: Should have pulled a new flood? Many Hats
RSC Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 69
Thanks Randy

Return to Top