Thread Options
#1538987 - 04/21/11 06:55 PM Regulation DD
BabyB Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
In regards to section 230.3 of Reg. DD is states that disclosures are required to use consistent terminology when describing terms or features that are required to be disclosed. Would account information and descriptions found on the Banks website (available for consumers) be held to this requirement? i.e. monthly fees etc. Or would this only be looked at in light of UDAP if the terms are not consistent?

Return to Top
Audit
#1538993 - 04/21/11 07:01 PM Re: Regulation DD BabyB
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 78,597
Galveston, TX
I have seen the FDIC cite banks for Reg. DD violations based on using inconsistent terminology between the initial disclosures, periodic statements and any and all advertising, including that on a bank's website.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1539067 - 04/21/11 08:20 PM Re: Regulation DD rlcarey
BabyB Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Any thoughts on the UDAP side of it?

Return to Top
#1539114 - 04/21/11 09:08 PM Re: Regulation DD BabyB
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 78,597
Galveston, TX
Why would they cite it as a UDAP when they can tie it to a direct violation of an existing regulation?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1539124 - 04/21/11 09:16 PM Re: Regulation DD rlcarey
BabyB Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Well, our thought is that UDAP is being looked at in every aspect of banking, even where you least expect it! So it could possibly be cited as a Reg DD AND UDAP violation. That is why I'm questioning it. I want to make sure that all the bases are covered and that I'm not miss interpreting anything.

Return to Top
#1539166 - 04/22/11 02:13 AM Re: Regulation DD BabyB
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 78,597
Galveston, TX
Well I guess if the website was worded in a manner that was deemed outright deceptive, than you could face a UDAP violation also. But if you were just referring to a "monthly service charge fee" rather than a "monthly fee", which not might be consistent under Regulation DD, I would be hard pressed to see how that would be a UDAP.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1540121 - 04/25/11 03:32 PM Re: Regulation DD rlcarey
DeeQ Offline
10K Club
DeeQ
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,762
Turnpike Exit 10
BabyB, you may want to read ABA's magazine when it comes out. There is a nice article about the longer reaching arm of UDAP.
_________________________
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z