In my opinion #1 is an issue... based on 226.42d(2)(iii) and the definition referred to in that section located at 226.42d(5)(i)... To me that says the CCO should not make ANY appraiser decisions...
See:
(d) Prohibition on conflicts of interest —(1)(i) In general. No person preparing a valuation or performing valuation management functions for a covered transaction may have a direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the property or transaction for which the valuation is or will be performed.
2) Employees and affiliates of creditors with assets of more than $250 million for both of the past two calendar years. For any covered transaction in which the creditor had assets of more than $250 million as of December 31st for both of the past two calendar years, a person subject to paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section who is employed by or affiliated with the creditor does not have a conflict of interest in violation of paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section based on the person's employment or affiliate relationship with the creditor if:
(iii) No employee, officer or director in the creditor's loan production function, as defined in paragraph (d)(5)(i) of this section, is directly or indirectly involved in selecting, retaining, recommending or influencing the selection of the person to prepare a valuation or perform valuation management functions, or to be included in or excluded from a list of approved persons who prepare valuations or perform valuation management functions
d(5) Definitions. For purposes of this paragraph, the following definitions apply:
(i) Loan production function. The term “loan production function” means an employee, officer, director, department, division, or other unit of a creditor with responsibility for generating covered transactions, approving covered transactions, or both.
Last edited by AFaquir; 02/16/12 03:13 PM.
_________________________
In life, there is a lot less that could get better and a lot more that could get worse.
MBA Fin/MBS HR
My views only!