This is from SAR Review #8:
For situations where the nature of the activity reported changes after the original Suspicious Activity Report filing, the suspicious activity is no longer considered “ongoing”--e.g., the customer in the above example begins sending or receiving funds in addition to making structured withdrawals. In such cases, the institution should consider the changed activity a new transaction and should file a new Suspicious Activity Report within the normal filing deadlines, rather than updating a previous filing after 90 days. Because the
activity is related, however, it may be appropriate to cross-reference any previously filed Suspicious Activity Reports in the narrative.
Not exactly the same situation, but very similar.
Politicians are like diapers. They need to be changed often and for the same reason.