It could be structuring. A lot of times you want to see a pattern, however stand alone flagrant events could trigger a SAR as well. I am more conservative and would really consider filing, especially not knowing the source of wealth.
The other option is to monitor them for a while and look for any other red flags. Did they say anything to the teller staff to indicate a reluctance to file any reporting on their transactions, did they act funny, make small talk about where the money came from? Any of those things can also help give you an idea as to what is going on.
Belive it or not, tellers are nosy and often have more details then they often share with us on the back office side. At least I have personally seen that no matter where I have been. A lot of times they (tellers) may not realize that small details and side conversations can really give you better direction when reviewing some of these "on the fence" kind of transactions.
Are you protected by filing a SAR in this case? Yes, just make sure to be consistent in approach if others do this same thing as examiners/auditors like to look for consistency. You are also well within your rights to monitor it to look for a pattern of activity. One time occurrences could be coincidence as well.
I have filed on similar activity, especially if it is a high risk account or there are other red flags. If you really just have this transaction event (two trans in two days) you may feel that monitoring to see if a pattern develops is the right way to go. Either should work well as long as you document your approach and thoughts behind your decision. Not every case is cut and dry. I know this is not the "yes file" or "no, don't file" short answer, but hopefully gives you some additional things to consider. You can be protected either way as long as you can justify what you did and your methodology behind it.