Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Thread Options
#1765250 - 12/07/12 06:38 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
YosemiteSamIAm Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,795
Guess
Bump for a reply.
_________________________
Sorry, did I just use my outside voice?

Return to Top
Flood Compliance
#1765276 - 12/07/12 07:16 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
Until the regulations are issued setting forth the actual notice requirements - who really knows. It may be combined into the Notice of Special Flood Hazards which does require a signature or proof of delivery.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1767234 - 12/13/12 06:36 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 lucyc
RobinB Offline
Gold Star
RobinB
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 298
Maryland
Originally Posted By: lvc
I just received a white paper from our Internal Auditor that states the following:

1. The maximum insurance available for multifamily dwellings has been increased to $500,000. I assume this amount is per building so my question is how can we calculate insurance for a unit owner?

?


Do you think this includes condos?

Return to Top
#1767264 - 12/13/12 07:01 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
No.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1769373 - 12/20/12 05:51 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Compli Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 73
Out there
The Federal Reserve published the new CMPs on 12/17. Included is the Biggert-Waters flood CMP increase to $2000. The Rules and Regulations document (link below) shows the amendment took effect on 7/1/2012. Biggert-Waters was signed on 7/6. How will the agencies look at the penalties during an exam? Will they assess the increased amount to loans originated on or after 7/1 or 7/6 or does the increase apply to all loans no matter when they were originated?

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/12/17/2012-30251/rules-of-practice-and-procedure

Return to Top
#1769433 - 12/20/12 07:16 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
Who knows. They don't even assess the full $385 per violation now - so it really is up their discretion. If you don't have any violations - which you shouldn't - it really should be all hypothetical. They can always assess even more under Section 1818, if they so choose.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1769568 - 12/20/12 10:04 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Compli
Reads Regs Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,309
The OCC's final rule about the inflation adjustment for CMPs had a 12/6/12 effective date. It said that the new CMP amounts would apply to violations that occur on or after the final rule's effective date. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-11-06/pdf/2012-27074.pdf
_________________________
Opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer. They are not legal advice.

Return to Top
#1769906 - 12/21/12 07:58 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Compli Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 73
Out there
Thanks for the information. FDIC effective date is 12/31/12, OCC 12/6/12. No wonder we get turned around with dates!

Return to Top
#1771402 - 12/31/12 10:51 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Compli
Reads Regs Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,309
The OCC made a technical correction to their final rule to say that the increased CMPs for flood violations applies to those that occurred on or after July 6, 2012. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles...oceedings-civil
_________________________
Opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer. They are not legal advice.

Return to Top
#1771798 - 01/02/13 11:00 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Reads Regs
kmg Offline
100 Club
kmg
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 124
Wisconsin
I'm wondering about the mandatory escrow requirement. The requirement is for any mortgage outstanding or entered into after the effective date.

So, does that mean I need to begin flood escrow on some of my existing portfolio mid-term? I'm thinking it might be worth starting that project this year as policies come due.
_________________________
Opinions are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Return to Top
#1771825 - 01/03/13 12:30 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
I would suggest you relax on the escrow thing until regulations are issued:

SEC. 100209. ESCROW OF FLOOD INSURANCE PAYMENTS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 102(d) of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)) is amended
to read as follows:

(1) REGULATED LENDING INSTITUTIONS.—

(A) FEDERAL ENTITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR LENDING
REGULATIONS.—Each Federal entity for lending regulation (after consultation and coordination with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council) shall, by regulation,direct that all premiums and fees for flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, for improved real estate or a mobile home, shall be paid to the regulated lending institution or servicer for any loan secured by the improved real estate or mobile home, with the same frequency as payments on the loan are made, for the duration of the loan.

Also, institution with less than $1 billion in assets will be exempt.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1772742 - 01/04/13 08:42 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Patricia Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 335
Kansas
OCC Examiners in Kansas are requiring their banks to give the new insurance disclosure (100222)even though this has not been implemented. According to the OCC this was effective July 6, 2012.

Return to Top
#1772769 - 01/04/13 09:03 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
Well, good for them. Did they happen to give those banks a copy of the "required" notice?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1772794 - 01/04/13 09:16 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Patricia Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 335
Kansas
Of course not.

Return to Top
#1772916 - 01/05/13 02:14 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
NU Rhules Offline
Gold Star
NU Rhules
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 476
SE, Nebraska
The other day the ABA's daily newsletter inserted confusion into this matter by not informing the reader that compliance is not yet required. I believe they assumed we all know that. So they simply jumped on the new news that congress had a voice vote to remove "commercial" from the law, but by doing so, they inserted confusion.

Return to Top
#1774629 - 01/10/13 02:46 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Beachbum, CRCM Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 499
Knee Deep in Regs
YosemiteSamIAm, did you ever receive a copy of the notice on availability of private flood insurance from Chase? Is anyone providing that notice to their customers?
_________________________
What we think, we become.
Buddha

Return to Top
#1775416 - 01/11/13 05:51 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
The Senate pased S. 3677 yesterday to clarify that the escrow requirement only impacts residential and not commercial loans.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1775961 - 01/14/13 04:57 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Soccer Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,028
Utopia
I recently saw a notice from an Insurance Co. letting one of our borrowers know that their premiums would be increasing do to the loss of subsidies. Are any of you sending a notice from the bank also?
_________________________
Everything happens for a reason

Return to Top
#1776184 - 01/15/13 01:32 AM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
It is not up to the bank to notify customers of increased insurance premiums.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1777731 - 01/17/13 11:35 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 kmg
bOaty Offline
Power Poster
bOaty
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,266
Chillin an grillin
Originally Posted By: kmg
I'm wondering about the mandatory escrow requirement. The requirement is for any mortgage outstanding or entered into after the effective date.

So, does that mean I need to begin flood escrow on some of my existing portfolio mid-term? I'm thinking it might be worth starting that project this year as policies come due.


That's what I was thinking. Is there any clarification yet? We aren't 1B yet but are aiming to go in that direction. I'm wondering if it isn't worth just getting things set up to escrow now rather than having to worry about it once we cross the 1B mark.
_________________________
HMDAHMDAHMDAHMDAHMDAHMDA

Return to Top
#1777740 - 01/18/13 12:06 AM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
Wait for the regulations:

‘‘(1) REGULATED LENDING INSTITUTIONS.—
‘‘(A) FEDERAL ENTITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR LENDING
REGULATIONS.—Each Federal entity for lending regulation
(after consultation and coordination with the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council) shall, by regulation,
direct that all premiums and fees for flood insurance
under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, for
improved real estate or a mobile home, shall be paid to
the regulated lending institution or servicer for any loan
secured by the improved real estate or mobile home, with
the same frequency as payments on the loan are made,
for the duration of the loan.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1782976 - 02/05/13 05:43 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Compli Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 73
Out there
Came across this on FEMA's site and was also mentioned in a meeting. FEMA has rescinded the NFIP Mandatory Purchase of Flood Insurance Guidelines.

In accordance with FEMA Directive 112-12, any policy document older than three years from the date of issuance must be reviewed for accuracy and updated or rescinded if information is found to be out of date. The current version of the Guidelines contains outdated information and guidance that has been made obsolete by the new legislation, "The Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012".

Therefore, FEMA has decided the best course of action, to prevent confusion on the part of our stakeholders, is to rescind the Guidelines. Lenders should consult their respective regulatory agency for information regarding compliance with the mandatory purchase requirements.

http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=2954

Return to Top
#1782981 - 02/05/13 05:58 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Compli
Dani York, CRCM Offline
Power Poster
Dani York, CRCM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,663
TN
Originally Posted By: Compli
Came across this on FEMA's site and was also mentioned in a meeting. FEMA has rescinded the NFIP Mandatory Purchase of Flood Insurance Guidelines.

In accordance with FEMA Directive 112-12, any policy document older than three years from the date of issuance must be reviewed for accuracy and updated or rescinded if information is found to be out of date. The current version of the Guidelines contains outdated information and guidance that has been made obsolete by the new legislation, "The Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012".

Therefore, FEMA has decided the best course of action, to prevent confusion on the part of our stakeholders, is to rescind the Guidelines. Lenders should consult their respective regulatory agency for information regarding compliance with the mandatory purchase requirements.

http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=2954



So now we are at the mercy of interpretive guidance from the field offices...... eek mad
_________________________
I can't herd the cats anymore, so I just set up the electric fences and let them fry when they stray out of bounds.

Return to Top
#1783058 - 02/05/13 08:19 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Compli
Reads Regs Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,309
Thanks. The ABA just updated its staff analysis of the Biggert-Waters Act to reflect this. They also made an update about private flood insurance based on some recent guidance from the GSEs.
_________________________
Opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer. They are not legal advice.

Return to Top
#1783112 - 02/05/13 09:48 PM Re: Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 ComplianceGrl15
Compli Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 73
Out there
Thanks for the info that ABA updated their staff analysis.

Return to Top
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3