When the examiners ask for CTRs in the future, I'll be happy to give them what was provided to us...
You won't be alone.
A couple decades ago Treasury told the regulators, in writing, not to review CTRs then direct banks to file individual corrections. The explanation was pretty simple: We see them all. If we want something corrected we will direct the filer to correct it. (Yes, I know that not every error would be obvious to them, but I assume Treasury knew that that too.) Nevertheless, over time, regulators returned to the practice of reviewing individual CTRs in smaller institutions simply because they are low hanging fruit, easy to review and easy to criticize.
Now, the report has more than 100 automated error codes. Perhaps FinCEN will send examiners another memo that says: Your time could be better spent.
Banks are clearly required to keep and to be able to produce the data, not the reports. I realize this thread was originally about SARs, but it's not necessarily a positive that a vendor can print a pseudo CTR: If you give a mouse a cookie, he's going to want a glass of milk.