Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1798609 - 03/27/13 12:58 PM Insurance on additional building
Likes to Comply Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,109
In the mountains
During a flood review, we discovered that a property used as collateral had an additional building on it that was not insured. The customer was notified. The customer isn't going to purchase the coverage because they don't want to pay for the flood elevation certificate that the insurance company is requiring. So we have to force-place.

Currently the insurance and taxes are escrowed. Do force-placed premiums have to be paid out of the escrow? or recalculated to include? or do we just add it to the loan like we commonly do?

Thanks in advance for your help!
_________________________
Always learning something new...

Return to Top
Flood Compliance
#1799498 - 03/28/13 11:12 PM Re: Insurance on additional building Likes to Comply
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,393
Galveston, TX
Why would you not added it into the escrow? The rules say that if you escrow, if have to escrow for flood. I see no exemption for force placed policies.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top