#1801425 - 04/04/1303:27 PMForce placed hazard and small servicers
HR Banker
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,027
Can someone clarify this for me? We are a "small servicer" so thankfully some of the servicing rules don't apply to us. My confusion is concerning the force placed hazard insurance. Are small servicers exempt from having to provide the 45 and 30 day notices? It mentions that "the rule against obtaining force-placed insurance in cases in which hazard insurance may be maintained through an escrow account exempts small servicers.......". So what is that statement exempting us from? That whole section all together or just if it is an escrow loan?
#1802720 - 04/09/1303:19 PMRe: Force placed hazard and small servicers RR Joker
HR Banker
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,027
We only escrow HPMLs and we have other exisiting non-escrow loans with force placed hazard. So it seems that going forward we will have to give the 2 required notices when force placing hazard, according to how you read it, right?
ltackett - You need to finish the sentence that you quoted:
"so long as any force-placed insurance purchased by the small servicer is less expensive to a borrower than the amount of any disbursement the servicer would have made to maintain hazard insurance coverage."
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
We only escrow HPMLs and we have other exisiting non-escrow loans with force placed hazard. So it seems that going forward we will have to give the 2 required notices when force placing hazard, according to how you read it, right?
Yes.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.
#1802824 - 04/09/1305:24 PMRe: Force placed hazard and small servicers rlcarey
HR Banker
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,027
Originally Posted By: rlcarey
ltackett - You need to finish the sentence that you quoted:
"so long as any force-placed insurance purchased by the small servicer is less expensive to a borrower than the amount of any disbursement the servicer would have made to maintain hazard insurance coverage."
I didn't finish the sentence as I don't see why we would force place something that has escrow in the first place. My only concern is whether or not we have to do the 2 required notices. I just needed to verify if the small servicer exemption part would apply.
#1802960 - 04/09/1307:52 PMRe: Force placed hazard and small servicers rlcarey
HR Banker
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,027
Thanks for helping to clarify but aren't we going to have to give the 45 and 15 day notices in all force placing cases and not just if force placed is more than their last policy?
Not if you are a small servicer and you already have an escrow account and the force placed policy is cheaper than their own policy. That's the exemption.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
Moreover, the Bureau believes that it is unnecessary to set limitations on a servicer’s right to assess on borrowers charges retroactively because the statute establishes that a borrower has an unconditional right to a full refund of force-placed insurance premium charges and related fees the borrower has paid for any period in which the borrower’s hazard insurance and the force-placed insurance were both in place.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com