Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1810979 - 05/03/13 07:40 PM CTR
layers Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
I have a question regarding CTRs. John and Jane have a joint account together. Jane comes in and withdraws $15,000. We file a CTR on Jane only.
We have always filed a CTR on whoever conducted the transaction. We are now being told that a CTR would need to be filed for both John and Jane. How does everyone else handle this type of situation.

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#1810981 - 05/03/13 07:43 PM Re: CTR layers
CULady Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 496
WA
WHO is telling you that you need to fill one out for both? There is no way to prove that John had any kind of benefit for the money that Jane withdrew.
Unless John was present at the time of the withdrawal, you should only file on Jane.

Return to Top
#1810983 - 05/03/13 07:43 PM Re: CTR layers
devsfan Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,927
NYC
There is no clear-cut guidance but the general consensus is that you cannot go wrong with including all account-owners of CTRs for deposits and withdrawals.

Return to Top
#1810987 - 05/03/13 07:47 PM Re: CTR layers
ComplianceGurl, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 500
For withdrawals we have always filed only on the individual(s) present. If only one party of a joint account is present we file only on that person.

Return to Top
#1810988 - 05/03/13 07:47 PM Re: CTR layers
CULady Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 496
WA

Return to Top
#1810989 - 05/03/13 07:49 PM Re: CTR ComplianceGurl, CRCM
CULady Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 496
WA
Originally Posted By: ComplianceGurl
For withdrawals we have always filed only on the individual(s) present. If only one party of a joint account is present we file only on that person.


And this is how we have operated in the past as well.

Return to Top
#1811023 - 05/03/13 08:17 PM Re: CTR layers
ComplianceGurl, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 500
I just called FinCEN and left a message. They called me back within 5 minutes!!! So, I was told that it's strictly an institutional call even when BOTH owners are present. He said that the knowledge on who is benefitting from the funds should be derived from conversation or observation from the customer. He said the bottom line is that you would need to be able to give an explanation to an examiner if asked. He said, even if both owners are present, it doesn't necessarily mean they are both benefitting from it. I guess my take away from this is be consistent with your filings. When we have one individual present for a cash withdrawal, we file only on that person. If we have both owners present, we file on both.

Return to Top
#1811024 - 05/03/13 08:18 PM Re: CTR layers
layers Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
Thank you for your input!!!

Return to Top
#1811046 - 05/03/13 08:49 PM Re: CTR layers
CULady Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 496
WA
Wow, a call back in 5 minutes and GOOD CLEAR information! Thanks ComplianceGurl! smile

Return to Top
#1811054 - 05/03/13 08:57 PM Re: CTR CULady
ComplianceGurl, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 500
Originally Posted By: CULady
Wow, a call back in 5 minutes and GOOD CLEAR information! Thanks ComplianceGurl! smile


I know!!! I was quite impressed! I wonder though if I called back I'd get the same answer! haha!

Return to Top
#1811096 - 05/03/13 11:36 PM Re: CTR layers
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
Yeah, it is just too bad the answer was not consistent with their other printed materials. smile
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z