Just want a second opinion. Someone received a fraudulent wire from her “fiancé,” whom she has never met and who is deployed overseas (yes, I know, total scam). Wire went back to the original bank once the fraud was discovered. During interviews with the customer she let on that there were wires at other banks and she figured out it was a scam, but went along with it anyway. We have the security incident report stating that she divulged this information during the interview. She may have been the victim in the beginning, but in the end she went along with it. My feeling is that she is the suspect. If she’s the victim and we have an unknown suspect, it doesn’t meet the reporting threshold. Am I right?