Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2028500 - 07/21/15 05:51 PM Rescission Extended to 3 Years
Nids Offline
New Poster
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 24
Let me preface this with the situation I am presenting has not occurred; it was something said by my Chief Lending Officer that sparked a question. I am new to the compliance world and am a grunt at my company so I can't correct my CLO or confirm what my CLO said without backup.

All that being said, during training, my CLO said if rescission is done wrong, the rescission period goes from 3 days to 3 years. In the case of a "mess Up" and they rescind in that 3 years, they get everything back except for the principle. My understanding was they got everything back, except for what was paid to a third party...unless modified by a court order.

I am sure this doesn't happen often and would possibly involve courts, but I really thought we had to give everything back…am I completely wrong? If we mess up, do we get to keep the principle?

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#2028510 - 07/21/15 05:57 PM Re: Rescission Extended to 3 Years Nids
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,358
Galveston, TX
Well, I would first clarify what the CLO meant. In general, his statement is correct. All interest and fees and required third party charges with be refundable from day one until the day of rescission and the borrower would in turn be responsible for paying off the remaining principal of the note.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2028532 - 07/21/15 06:22 PM Re: Rescission Extended to 3 Years Nids
Nids Offline
New Poster
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 24
Thank you; I was afraid I was reading the reg incorrectly.

Return to Top
#2028689 - 07/21/15 10:01 PM Re: Rescission Extended to 3 Years Nids
Richard Insley Offline
10K Club
Richard Insley
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,180
Toano, VA
Originally Posted By Nids
If we mess up, do we get to keep the principle?
Originally Posted By rlcarey
...borrower would...be responsible for paying off the...principal of the note.
There remains the (unlikely) possibility that the bank could sustain a 100% loss.

Section 1026.23(d) lays out a series of steps that begin the moment the creditor receives a borrower's notice of rescission.
1. the security interest giving rise to the right of rescission becomes void,
2. the lender must refund all fees and FCs to the consumer,
3. the lender must remove the deed of trust from the public record (and take any other action necessary to reflect the termination of the security interest),
4. IF the lender has completed steps 2 and 3 within 20 calendar days after receiving the borrower's rescission notice, the consumer must "tender the (principal) to the creditor",
5. if the creditor does not take possession of the money within 20 calendar days after the consumer's tender, the consumer may keep the money without further obligation.

Notice that the lender will sustain a 100% loss if it drags its feet in steps 4 or 5.
_________________________
...gone fishing.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z