Rolling Stones

"But it's all right, Im jumpin jack flash,
Its a gas! gas! gas!"

I'm so bored that I actually bothered to post something in the moronic place that the Cooler has become.

I'm taking pride in the fact that my team has won 4 Super Bowls in the past 14 years. I've seen ZERO proof that they cheated to win this most recent one, nor any proof that cheating contributed to their winning any of them. You've apparently seen more proof than I have. Maybe you could clue us in as to what that proof is.

The balls were deflated regardless if Brady or anyone in the office knew about it. There is a better than average chance that they would not have even beaten Baltimore with out cheating,

I'm so bored tha....hey! I think boaty just called me a moron

Again, I've seen no proof that the balls were deflated. There have been so many holes punched in the "science" of the Wells Report that it's ridiculous.

And how, exactly, did they cheat against Baltimore?

you remember the deflated balls?

If they did not cheat why did the team suspend the locker room guys?

oh, Beech...you missed a great opportunity here to say "There have been so many holes punched in the "science" of the Wells Report that
it holds no air
it deflated the argument
its full of hot air


le sigh...

and hey, did I hear correctly that the ball in question was auctioned yesterday for $44,000?

of course, Mr. Gooddell disagrees strongly with your assessment of the report, so much so that he has moved forwards with fines and suspension.

Hey!

I am so bored I miss the morons.

It's Tinkerbell!!!! ((hug))

Miss you.

They are around Pale-just look closer.

here is one:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdo...-133154290.html

Good for them.

I was referring to the one who bought it.

Hiya Tink!!!!! MUAH!!

...he hasn't given a timeline on Brady's fines/suspension as of today

based upon the timeline of the wells report he may be waiting for after game 4

It is amazing how we all can agree/disagree on guilt/cheat but all agree on the patheticness of the NFL. (I made up a word as well)

Define proof. It would seem that you would not believe it if you saw Tom Brady letting the air out of balls on camera. You would simply claim that is an imposter. Lets get real. The texts make it obvious that, yet again, the NE Patiorts are guilty of cheating.

Had Tom Brady cooperated with investigators, I think you would have an argument with a leg to stand on. But he didn't.

Open to speculation (as the entire investigation is), but Wells was said to have approached Brady in the beginning of the investigation in an incredibly accusatory manner, before the report was written, and that was the reason for Tom's lack of cooperation with the investigation. His lawyer was present, and advised him as such, as it was clear to them both that Wells' mind was already made up.

I also completely agree with Ed's post, it's nice to have a common enemy, Patriots supporter or not, in the NFL, and their mishandling of yet another issue. Had they competently done so, I doubt this would even be a discussion at this point. But hey, isn't the controversy what makes sports so great?

What investigator has not used "incredibly accusatory manner" when stonewalled by someone for that matter how many times has a examiner asked you pretty please when send out a FDL. When you are extremely arrogant ( Tom not any poster here I would like to get that out of the way) every question is asked "incredibly accusatory manner" when you can do no wrong.

Looks like someone read the Poster's Guide to Not Getting So Easily Offended!

That's very true, although from the report I read he was essentially in Tom's face and yelling, whereas an examiner and any professional handling the matter correctly would make such accusations in a more calm, coherent manner. But then again I'm sure the report was from the Boston media, so it had the same sort of biased twist that the anti-Brady/Pats articles have as well.

If Goodell chooses to not make a ruling until after the 4th game (I'm assuming that the suspension still stands despite the appeal? Meaning that the suspension would be over by then), would you say that he knows he was wrong, and chose to cop out on the issue by waiting rather than giving a formal statement in order to cover himself? I think it's pretty ridiculous it's even taken this long, whether the ruling gets overturned or not.