Thread Options
|
#1373356 - 04/13/10 05:29 PM
Free and Reduced Lunch.....
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
Anyone hearing from examiners that they will no longer accept more than 50% on FRL as evidence of an investment or an activity being community development.
We are getting this from the OCC. This after we have prioritized AVID type programs in schools with very high FPLs.
Good grief!
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1373504 - 04/13/10 07:06 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Pale Rider
|
Power Poster
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,266
Chillin an grillin
|
That's not good news. How frustrating considering the effort that you've put into this. Sorry...
Our exam keeps getting pushed back. I'm very anxious to find out if we are going to have similar comments from our regulators.
Hope not.
_________________________
HMDAHMDAHMDAHMDAHMDAHMDA
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1375990 - 04/17/10 01:59 AM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Kathleen O. Blanchard
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
Some of my schools are more than 80% FRL KB. I just love how we are experts at changing horses in midstream.
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1375996 - 04/17/10 04:31 AM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Kathleen O. Blanchard
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,084
Connecticut
|
I have not heard of this interpretation at all. The regulation and the Q&A's have always required that the beneficiaries of a "community service" must primarily be low- or moderate-income persons or families. This always has been understood to mean that a majority of beneficiaries would qualify. In fact, the explanation of the qualification to meet the "primary purpose" test for community development purposes explicitly uses the term "majority", as in beneficiaries of the activity or dollars used for the activity. See the Q&A's explanation of primary purpose test and show it to your examiner and then ask them to cite the authority for their interpretation.
_________________________
CRA Exam Preparation, CRA Performance Evaluations, Key Performance Benchmarks, & maps
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1376073 - 04/19/10 12:50 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Len S
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 39
Washington, DC
|
Len is correct; the primary beneficiaries must be students from low- and moderate-income families. 12 cfr 25.12(g)(2). The OCC is saying that using free- and reduced-lunch numbers is not an automatic proxy for determing LMI. You will need to show the examiners that the free/reduced lunch criteria results in income levels that are the same (or lower) than the income level requirements for LMI for your AA. The examiners cannot use free/reduced lunch as an automatic proxy because neither the regulation nor the interagency questions and answers cite those as an automatic proxy.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1376128 - 04/19/10 01:55 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Karen Tucker
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
Maryland
|
This should not be a problem. Contact your state or county school system and ask what the level is to qualify. Here the number is shockingly lower than what HUD lists as Low to Moderate income. According to HUD our estimated median family income for 2009 is $82,100. Our local school system has a cutoff for families of 4 of $25,000 for free or reduced lunches. That is well below the 50% level Therefore many of our schools have supplementary non-profits and teacher driven programs to supplement this. On the up side, the programs do qualify for CRA as long as you keep them under the LMI levels as well.
_________________________
God made the world in only 7 days... but he didn't have any paperwork.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1376238 - 04/19/10 03:33 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Rie A
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
Be careful Rie. Each student within a program, such as AVID or some other college access program, must have some other evidence to support that they are from an LMI family. You cannot simply use the FRL percentage for the school or the district as a proxy for obtaining individual student numbers.
That is my takeaway from the above discussion.
Heretofore, the FRL percentage for the district or say, a high school, was used as a proxy for a college access program at that school or ISD. Now we must get additional evidence, such as census tracts or individual family income metrics.
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1376309 - 04/19/10 04:22 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Kathleen O. Blanchard
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
that sounds about right Ms KB...it can be a lot of leg work to get those numbers....
AVID programs have worked so well in getting LMI students to consider college, it is a great program....
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1376550 - 04/19/10 06:48 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Pale Rider
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
Maryland
|
We have never used AVID. Here in this county they put ALL of the children that want to go to college in AVID. Funny story, my daughter was "accepted" into AVID and was excited about it, as they really play it up, but then I got her into a really great charter school that scores at the top of the chart in the state. Now she is upset because there is no AVID program in the new school. The whole school is geared towards going to college!
_________________________
God made the world in only 7 days... but he didn't have any paperwork.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1380368 - 04/23/10 02:57 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Pale Rider
|
100 Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 133
SOMEWHERE
|
Our examiner (OCC)took the same view. While he accepted it for most of our efforts, he said if we did any major undertaking that we wanted a lot of credit for, we would need to document the income of the census tracts that feed into the school. But, I totally agree that FRL number should be sufficient. I cannot find any authority that the OCC has for changing horses in the middle of the stream and I do not believe that they have any basis for doing so.
_________________________
Opinions do not reflect opinion of employer and cannot be relied upon as advise.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2040030 - 09/23/15 12:46 AM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Pale Rider
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 39
Washington, DC
|
Update: effective Nov 2013, Q&As indicate if the majority of students qualify for free/reduced lunch that you have met the threshold for LMI. ___ .12(g)(2) - 1.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2040444 - 09/24/15 08:07 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Pale Rider
|
100 Club
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 241
South
|
I had the FR say the same thing as recent as August 2014 and showed them the Q&A and had no problems thankfully.
_________________________
The worst question is the one that goes unasked.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2043575 - 10/09/15 02:56 PM
Re: Free and Reduced Lunch.....
Live&Learn
|
New Poster
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 19
|
I had an examiner express the school must be 51% and over to qualify as FRL. I asked him if a school ends up in 50.47% free reduced lunch if they would round.. and his face expression was pretty much a Nope.. I still told my mgmt that I am going to fight for it to count.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|