Thread Options
|
#1990314 - 01/22/15 03:01 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,229
Galveston, TX
|
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1990734 - 01/23/15 07:08 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
There is an article beginning on page 38 of Issue 22 of the SAR Activity Review that is based on the FinCEN SAR rather than the legacy SAR. Their sample narratives regurgitate a great deal of the information your bank already supplied in the text box portion of the report. It's simply unnecessary and makes them incredibly difficult to read. Yes, that's my opinion, but it's also held by a number of law enforcement people. Just tell them a story. Reference the sources of the information in the documentation you list at the end of the narrative section. If law enforcement is interested, they will pick up the supporting documentation and find all the minutiae they need. Your job is to get them interested and convince them that the evidence they will need is contained in your supporting documentation.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1990759 - 01/23/15 07:43 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,229
Galveston, TX
|
Detailed transaction information - That's what the spreadsheet attachment is for.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1990843 - 01/23/15 10:00 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
New Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
|
I include a summary of historical activity when reporting behavior changes that could be suspicious when compared to that activity. For example, "in a 6 month account review the customer's activity was typical for an account held for household purposes with payroll credits and debits for household expences until"...then describe what's unusual. With more detail of historical volumes when appropriate.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2046529 - 10/27/15 08:37 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
MassCompliance4
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
From page 84 of the instructions:
4. Continuing Reports: A continuing report should be filed on suspicious activity that continues after an initial FinCEN SAR is filed. Continuing reports should be filed at least every 90 days until the suspicious activity ceases. Continuing reports must be completed in their entirety, including the information about all subjects involved in the suspicious activity and all financial institutions where the activity occurred. The continuing report Part V narrative should include all details of the suspicious activity for the 90-day period encompassed by the report, and only such data from prior reports as is necessary to understand the activity. Do not reproduce the narratives from prior reports in the continuing report. Provide both the dollar amount involved in the suspicious activity for the 90-day period in Item 26 and the cumulative dollar amount for the current and all prior related reports in Item 28. If continuing losses are involved for any financial institution recorded in Part III, record the 90-day loss in Item 63 and the cumulative loss in Part V.
It's like watching Pretty Little Liars, you can't just show your readers this episode (chapter) and expect them to have any idea what's going on. Every SAR you file has to tell a complete story.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2046610 - 10/28/15 02:06 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
Power Poster
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,063
Pennsylvania
|
When I file an initial SAR, I tend to keep the core information (information that likely will not change) about the subjects and the situation in a few sentences (the hook if you will, similar to a song) unto itself so that if a follow up is required, I can literally cut and paste this core information into the next SAR. From there I update the core information (if necessary), the activity that occurred over the past 90 days, update any narrative on the aggregate totals, and any new additional information I may have. In my experience, a series of SARs may only pique the interest of investigators when the aggregate totals hit a certain level, if they are looking at just the 3rd or 4th report in the series, I want them to have the full back story to avoid them having to go back and read through the previous reports (which they may or may not take time to do).
I hesitate to say "cut and paste" because I don't want to give the impression that I'm just pasting a narrative from the previous SAR and adding to it, that's not what they want and not what I mean when I say that. There is however some basic core information that should be on the original and all follow up reports.
_________________________
Knowledge is knowing what to say. Wisdom is knowing when to say it.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2119521 - 02/24/17 09:02 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,115
Where the Green Grass Grows
|
Can I revive this thread?
Is the state of the industry still, law enforcement wants a summary, and regulators what super-detailed narratives? I can't be the only one having this disconnect, can I?
I'm been given feedback several times that there should be nothing in my blanks or attachments that doesn't appear in the narrative both by my federal and state regulator and auditor -- but I'm afraid reading every detail about every XYZ in detail (so that my number in part 2 #26 can be balanced back to my narrative). The regulators & auditors state that law enforcement doesn't want to request our backup documentation and they don't look at the spreadsheets. My current report is an easy peasy check kiting report -- but I've got a detailed issue I've got to write up soon, and I don't want to bog down the narrative with ATM addresses and timestamps.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2119553 - 02/24/17 10:23 PM
Re: What's in your narrative?
BSAkpo
|
100 Club
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 133
flyover country
|
We have been advised and complimented on this format:
Summary paragraph---tell the whole story, include subject, date ranges, keyword activity and dollar amounts.
Use subsequent paragraph(s) to give more detailed information to support paragraph 1. If you use a spreadsheet, reference that in the narrative. For something like kiting we would say (X) number of transactions from this date to that date, at the following location(s) for a total $ amt. Additional detail in the spreadsheet.
If your narrative is organized and informative and it has information that law enforcement is looking for, they will call and ask for the supporting documentation. For an auditor or examiner to suggest otherwise is incorrect. The reality is that most of what banks report in SARs is simply not what law enforcement maybe looking for at that time. If you know or suspect it is something really worthwhile, contact your local LE and report the information directly as well.
Over the years, we've fostered relationships with the SAR committee reviewers for our region and they have been instrumental in getting SAR data to the right SAR committee if it is outside our region. But we had to network and report too.
_________________________
It is actually possible for you and I to have different opinions and yet still live peaceably upon this planet.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#2119970 - 03/01/17 10:44 AM
Re: What's in your narrative?
Always In Training
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
The regulators & auditors state that law enforcement doesn't want to request our backup documentation and they don't look at the spreadsheets. That's so ignorant... All your SAR does is tell a story. The supporting documentation proves the story is true. Law enforcement will request your supporting documentation when they need real evidence for their investigation. They are not going to prosecute someone based only on what your narrative says. A SAR is not evidence. It doesn't prove anything. The idea that every detail has to be repeated in the narrative is regional; e.g. the OCC in the eastern half of one state where I work insists that it's a "rule." In the western half, no such claim is made by any agency. Some auditors feel it's their job to "enforce" whatever the regulator's local office is going to say. I think it's very helpful for an auditor with local experience to give the bank a "heads up" about a common misinterpretation, but there's no need to make it the gospel, particularly when dealing with banks regulated by other agencies. Frog Lady has a good template.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|