They are saying LP is the conditional approval and once we run the information through LP we had conditional approval. For the record I do not agree with this and I was ready to bump it up the ladder over the field examiner and district supervisor's heads but my board Chairman overruled me.
If you read Dan's "previous rant" string - that's exactly the point I brought up in March/April 2015 about "approved, not accepted". I'm not going to go there right now. In fact, I'm working on an article with some updated information that is gained from clarifications in the newly issued HMDA rules that will reverse my previous opinions on this topic.
If you look at Attachment B of the CFPB's HMDA Small Entity Compliance Guide (pages 105-108), you'll see some further explanation of the action taken codes (withdrawn, denied, approved not accepted, etc.). Also on page 66183 of the 10/28/15 Federal Register (the HMDA Final Rule], ti states:
While some financial institutions may view any type of approval, even one with many outstanding conditions, as an approved loan and wish to report it as such under Regulation C, the Bureau believes this would be an inappropriate result for applications that ultimately did not result in originations and were conditioned on underwriting or creditworthiness conditions. Maybe this will help you decide is AUS is a decision point.